Author
Listed:
- Tao Huang
(State Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Control, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)
- Shaoshan An
(State Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Control, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)
- Wanyun Huang
(State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Soil Health and Green Remediation, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)
- Baoyuan Liu
(State Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Control, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
Advanced Institute of Natural Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Zhuhai 519087, China)
Abstract
The Loess Plateau (LP), the cradle of Chinese civilization, has a long history of agricultural activities closely linked to ecological changes. This study addresses a fundamental question: what was the maximum sustainable cropland area threshold for the LP prior to modern soil and water conservation measures? To answer this, we analyzed the historical data to investigate changes in the cropland area and their ecological impacts over the past 4000 years, with the specific aim of examining the long-term interactions between land exploitation and the ecosystem that defined sustainable thresholds. Three key stages of cropland area development were identified: slow growth (2000–500 BC), a fluctuating phase (500 BC–1000 AD), and rapid expansion (1000–2000 AD). During the slow-growth and rapid-expansion stages, the cropland areas were estimated at 34.9 ± 23.4 and 117.9 ± 34.1 thousand km 2 , with growth rates of 2.9 and 8.7 thousand km 2 /100 years, respectively, while the fluctuating period stabilized at 62.1 ± 18.1 thousand km 2 . Population growth was the primary driver of cropland expansion (56.9%), followed by agricultural technology and policy adjustments (27%) and climate change (16.1%). Particularly over the past 1000 years, climate deterioration and a population surge due to the abolition of the poll tax accelerated cropland expansion, resulting in deforestation, intensified soil erosion specific to the LP, and frequent flooding of the lower Yellow River (YR). In contrast, during the fluctuating period, rapid social development did not lead to major ecological issues, suggesting that moderate cropland expansion can balance social development and ecological sustainability. Based on the historical conditions, without modern soil and water conservation measures, this study determined that the upper limit of the cropland area during the fluctuating period (80.2 thousand km 2 ) is the maximum sustainable cropland area for the LP, establishing a scientific basis to guide future land-use strategies. Especially in the face of population pressure and climate deterioration, developing agriculture and adjusting policies to increase grain production will be essential to balance the ecological risks and maintenance of food security while remaining within this threshold. These findings offer insights into the agricultural history and ecological management of the LP and can serve as a reference for similar studies of other regions.
Suggested Citation
Tao Huang & Shaoshan An & Wanyun Huang & Baoyuan Liu, 2025.
"Loess Plateau Cropland: Evolution and Ecological Impacts over Four Millennia,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:1015-:d:1650656
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:1015-:d:1650656. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.