IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i4p780-d1628315.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Rural Human Settlement Development Quality and Impact Analysis: Empirical Evidence from China’s Micro Survey?

Author

Listed:
  • Sheng Xu

    (College of Economics and Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Xichuan Liu

    (College of Economics and Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Yu Xiao

    (College of Economics and Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Lu Zhang

    (College of Economics and Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

Abstract

Improving the quality of rural human settlements is a key objective in China’s rural revitalization strategy. The purpose of this study is to construct and evaluate the quality of rural human settlements in China from a micro perspective. To achieve this objective, the main tasks include constructing an evaluation system for rural human settlement quality from a micro perspective; measuring the overall and dimension-specific quality levels of rural human settlements using the entropy method based on data from 108 villages in Shandong, Jilin, and Hubei provinces; and further analyzing the influencing factors of rural human settlement quality, focusing on village per capita income, resident population, fire incidents, and agricultural input prices. The findings reveal the following: (1) The overall quality of rural human settlements in Hubei, Shandong, and Jilin is at a moderate-to-low level, with no significant differences among provinces. (2) Among the various dimensions of rural human settlement quality, economic development and public services score higher, whereas living facilities and sanitary conditions score relatively lower, reflecting the inertia of long-term resource allocation and the lagged effects of emerging projects. (3) An increase in village per capita net income and the resident population significantly improves rural human settlement quality, whereas incidents such as village fires and sharp increases in agricultural input prices significantly reduce it. This study provides empirical insights into the mechanisms affecting rural human settlement quality from a micro perspective and offers policy implications for its targeted improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheng Xu & Xichuan Liu & Yu Xiao & Lu Zhang, 2025. "Evaluation of Rural Human Settlement Development Quality and Impact Analysis: Empirical Evidence from China’s Micro Survey?," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:780-:d:1628315
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/780/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/780/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhaohui Zhang & Krishna P. Paudel & Kamal Upadhyaya, 2023. "Preference for rural living environment improvement initiatives in China," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 82(1), pages 61-78, January.
    2. Luiz D’Agostini & Alfredo Fantini, 2008. "Quality of Life and Quality of Living Conditions in Rural Areas: Distinctively Perceived and Quantitatively Distinguished," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 89(3), pages 487-499, December.
    3. Jing Zhang & Bingbing Huang & Xinming Chen & Congmou Zhu & Muye Gan, 2022. "Multidimensional Evaluation of the Quality of Rural Life Using Big Data from the Perspective of Common Prosperity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-21, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mei Zhang & Xinliang Wang, 2023. "Measurement of Common Prosperity of Chinese Rural Households Using Graded Response Models: Evidence from Zhejiang Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Vaishar Antonín & Vidovićová Lucie & Figueiredo Elisabete, 2018. "Quality of Rural Life. Editorial 16 June 2018," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 10(2), pages 180-190, June.
    3. Ying Wei & Anlu Zhang & Yan Ma, 2023. "A Bibliometric Review of Rural Living Environment Improvement Research in China Based on CNKI Database: 1992–2022," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Riccardo Beltramo & Andrea Rostagno & Alessandro Bonadonna, 2018. "Land Consolidation Associations and the Management of Territories in Harsh Italian Environments: A Review," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, March.
    5. Milan Lalić & Milka Bubalo Živković & Bojan Đerčan & Dragana Tekić, 2024. "Quality of Life as a Limiting Factor in the Development of the Region along the Great Bačka Canal (Serbia)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-33, March.
    6. Zuocheng Chen & Krishna P. Paudel & Stephen Devadoss, 2024. "Economic openness, financial bias, and the urban–rural income gap," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 242-263, February.
    7. Hongxun Xiang & Boleng Zhai & Yang Yang, 2024. "The realization logic of rural revitalization: Coupled coordination analysis of development and governance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(6), pages 1-22, June.
    8. Leiru Wei & Jingxian Di & Qian Zhou, 2025. "Exploring the Pathways Through Which the Digital Economy Drives Common Prosperity in the Context of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-20, April.
    9. Xi Lan & Hok Bun Ku & Yang Zhan, 2024. "Aesthetic Governance and China's Rural Toilet Revolution," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 55(2), pages 219-243, March.
    10. Michalska-Żyła Agnieszka & Marks-Krzyszkowska Małgorzata, 2018. "Quality of Life and Quality of Living in Rural Communes in Poland," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 10(2), pages 280-299, June.
    11. Borodina Tatiana & Savchenko Alexander, 2018. "Rural Settlements on Peatlands in Moscow Region: Impact of Economic Activities and Climate Changes on Quality of Life," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 10(3), pages 462-481, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:780-:d:1628315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.