IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i11p2183-d1786543.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Differential Impact Mechanisms of the Built Environment on Running-Space Selection: A Case Study of Suzhou’s Gusu District and Industrial Park District

Author

Listed:
  • Can Wang

    (Center for Chinese Urbanization Studies, Soochow University, Suzhou 215021, China
    Department of Urban and Rural Planning, School of Architecture, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China
    China–Portugal Belt and Road Joint Laboratory on Cultural Heritage Conservation Science, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China)

  • Jue Xu

    (Department of Urban and Rural Planning, School of Architecture, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China)

  • Yuanyuan Mao

    (Center for Chinese Urbanization Studies, Soochow University, Suzhou 215021, China
    Department of Urban and Rural Planning, School of Architecture, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China)

Abstract

Guided by the “Healthy China” initiative, understanding the impact of the built environment on running behavior is essential for encouraging regular physical activity and advancing public health. This study addresses a critical gap in healthy city research by examining the spatial heterogeneity in how urban environmental contexts affect residents’ running preferences. Focusing on two contrasting areas of Suzhou, namely the historic Gusu District and the modern Industrial Park District, we developed a 5Ds-based analytical framework (density, accessibility, diversity, design, and visual) that incorporates Suzhou’s unique water networks and street features. Methodologically, we used Strava heatmap data and multi-source environmental indicators to quantify built-environment attributes and examined their relationships with running-space selection. We applied linear regression and interpretable machine learning to reveal overall associations, while geographically weighted regression (GWR) was used to capture spatial variations. Results reveal significant spatial heterogeneity in how the built environment influences running-space selection. While the two districts differ in their urban form, runners in Gusu District prefer dense and compact street networks, whereas those in Industrial Park District favor open, natural spaces with higher levels of human vibrancy. Despite these differences, both districts show consistent preferences for spaces with a more intense land use mix, stronger transportation accessibility, and larger parks and green spaces. The multi-dimensional planning strategies derived from this study can improve the urban running environment and promote the health and well-being of residents.

Suggested Citation

  • Can Wang & Jue Xu & Yuanyuan Mao, 2025. "The Differential Impact Mechanisms of the Built Environment on Running-Space Selection: A Case Study of Suzhou’s Gusu District and Industrial Park District," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-28, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:11:p:2183-:d:1786543
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/11/2183/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/11/2183/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:11:p:2183-:d:1786543. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.