IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i11p2151-d1782317.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Vegetation Restoration Effectiveness in the Jvhugeng Mining Area of the Muli Coalfield Based on Sentinel-2 and Gaofen Data

Author

Listed:
  • Linxue Ju

    (Geological Institute of China Chemical Geology and Mine Bureau, China National Administration of Coal Geology, Beijing 100013, China)

  • Lei Chen

    (Geological Institute of China Chemical Geology and Mine Bureau, China National Administration of Coal Geology, Beijing 100013, China)

  • Junxing Liu

    (Geological Institute of China Chemical Geology and Mine Bureau, China National Administration of Coal Geology, Beijing 100013, China)

  • Sen Jiao

    (China Chemical Geology and Mine Bureau, China National Administration of Coal Geology, Beijing 100013, China)

  • Yanxu Zhang

    (College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology—Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Zhonglin Ji

    (School of Geography and Environment, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252059, China)

  • Caiya Yue

    (School of Geography and Environment, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252059, China)

Abstract

To address the serious ecological problems caused by long-term mining in the Muli Coalfield, a three-year ecological restoration project was initiated in 2020. The Jvhugeng mining area was the largest and most ecologically damaged area in the Muli Coalfield. Vegetation restoration is the core of mine ecological restoration. Scientific evaluation of the vegetation restoration status in the Jvhugeng mining area is significant for comprehensively revealing ecological restoration effectiveness in the Muli Coalfield. Based on Sentinel-2’s spectral and temporal advantages and GF-1/GF-6’s high spatial resolution in detailed portrayal, fractional vegetation cover (FVC) and landscape pattern index were determined separately. Thus, the vegetation restoration effectiveness and spatiotemporal dynamics of the Jvhugeng mining area from 2020 to 2023 were evaluated in terms of structural and functional dimensions. The results show that, from 2020 to 2023, vegetation cover extent (varying from 8.77 km 2 in 2020 to a peak of 17.93 km 2 in 2022 and then decreasing to 13.48 km 2 in 2023) and FVC (from 0.33 in 2020 to about 0.50 during 2021–2023) first increased sharply and then fluctuated. Vegetation regions with both high FVC and dominant landscape features also presented the characteristics of rapid expansion and then fluctuation. Vegetation restoration demonstrated significant effectiveness, with the natural ecological environment restored to some extent and remaining stable. Newly vegetated regions had high FVC and significant landscape pattern characteristics. However, vegetation cover expansion also led to further fragmentation and morphological complexity of vegetation landscape patterns in the study area. The results can provide a basis for quantitatively assessing ecological restoration effectiveness in the Jvhugeng mining area and even the Muli Coalfield. This can also provide a dual-source data synergy technical reference for dynamic monitoring and effective evaluation of vegetation restoration in other mining areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Linxue Ju & Lei Chen & Junxing Liu & Sen Jiao & Yanxu Zhang & Zhonglin Ji & Caiya Yue, 2025. "Evaluation of Vegetation Restoration Effectiveness in the Jvhugeng Mining Area of the Muli Coalfield Based on Sentinel-2 and Gaofen Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:11:p:2151-:d:1782317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/11/2151/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/11/2151/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:11:p:2151-:d:1782317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.