IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i10p2097-d1776314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Use and Production Practices Shape Unequal Labour Demand in Agriculture and Forestry

Author

Listed:
  • Una Diana Veipane

    (Faculty of Economics and Social Development, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Svetes Street 18, LV-3001 Jelgava, Latvia)

  • Irina Pilvere

    (Faculty of Economics and Social Development, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Svetes Street 18, LV-3001 Jelgava, Latvia)

  • Jüri Lillemets

    (Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Science, F. R. Kreutzwaldi Street 5, 51006 Tartu, Estonia)

  • Kristine Bilande

    (Faculty of Economics and Social Development, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Svetes Street 18, LV-3001 Jelgava, Latvia)

  • Aleksejs Nipers

    (Faculty of Economics and Social Development, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Svetes Street 18, LV-3001 Jelgava, Latvia)

Abstract

Agriculture and forestry remain vital sources of rural employment; yet, both sectors face challenges of low labour productivity, demographic change, and structural inefficiencies. Modernisation improves productivity but often reduces labour demand, creating a policy dilemma between innovation and job preservation. Therefore, this study aims to quantify labour input across different land use types and farm sizes in agriculture and forestry. Latvia was used as a case region representing a sparsely populated territory suitable for both agricultural activities and forestry. This study develops a multi-stage framework to quantify labour inputs across agricultural and forestry land uses. The research findings suggest that labour use intensity decreases as farm size increases; however, it exhibits greater variation across agricultural production types. Perennial plantations, vegetable and potato cultivation, and dairy farming show the highest labour demands, whereas energy crops and grass-based systems require the least. In forestry, establishment and tending dominate labour needs, while mechanised harvesting reduces input requirements. These findings highlight the strategic role of labour-intensive, high-value activities in sustaining rural employment and the need for targeted rural development policies that recognise this pattern, supporting employment in rural areas without discouraging improvements in labour productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Una Diana Veipane & Irina Pilvere & Jüri Lillemets & Kristine Bilande & Aleksejs Nipers, 2025. "Land Use and Production Practices Shape Unequal Labour Demand in Agriculture and Forestry," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-27, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:10:p:2097-:d:1776314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/10/2097/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/10/2097/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:10:p:2097-:d:1776314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.