IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i10p2019-d1767187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community Morphology and Perceptual Evaluation from the Perspective of Density: Evidence from 50 High-Density Communities in Guangzhou, China

Author

Listed:
  • Zihao Wang

    (School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, No. 381 Wushan Road, Guangzhou 510641, China)

  • Chunyang Zhang

    (School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, No. 381 Wushan Road, Guangzhou 510641, China)

  • Xinjian Li

    (School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, No. 381 Wushan Road, Guangzhou 510641, China)

  • Linlin Luo

    (Guangzhou Urban Renewal Planning and Design Research Institute Co., Ltd., No. 362 Dongfeng Middle Road, Guangzhou 510045, China)

Abstract

Spatial density, as a key indicator of the quality of the urban residential environment, comprises both physical and perceived dimensions. Physical density refers to objective spatial characteristics (e.g., building density and population density), whereas perceived density denotes residents’ perceptual evaluations (e.g., perceived crowding, visual openness, and overall environmental quality). Clarifying the relationship between physical and perceived density is therefore critical for advancing livability-oriented urban planning and design. This study examines the relationship through an empirical analysis of 50 representative high-density communities in Guangzhou. Using morphological classification, descriptive statistics, and multiple linear regression, the analysis compares objective density indicators with residents’ perceptual evaluations and identifies key environmental factors that shape perceived density. Findings indicate that physical and perceived density are not fully aligned: compact but coherent spatial forms can enhance residents’ perceptual evaluations, whereas overcrowded and deteriorating environments intensify negative perceptions. The identified community typologies—for example, urban villages, traditional walk-up estates, and modern high-rise complexes—exhibit distinct perceptual patterns and influencing factors. These results highlight the need for density regulation to move beyond conventional physical indicators and to incorporate perceptual dimensions into planning frameworks. Overall, the study provides theoretical insights and practical guidance for tailored strategies in the renewal and management of high-density communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Zihao Wang & Chunyang Zhang & Xinjian Li & Linlin Luo, 2025. "Community Morphology and Perceptual Evaluation from the Perspective of Density: Evidence from 50 High-Density Communities in Guangzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:10:p:2019-:d:1767187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/10/2019/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/10/2019/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jinliu Chen & Paola Pellegrini & Haoqi Wang, 2022. "Comparative Residents’ Satisfaction Evaluation for Socially Sustainable Regeneration—The Case of Two High-Density Communities in Suzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. He-Ming Zeng & Louie Sieh & Dong Zhang & Hao Huang & Yu-Zun Zhang & Jin-Yeu Tsou, 2025. "Exploring the Impact of the Publicness of Public Space in Hong Kong: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Ezio Micelli & Francesco Campagnari & Luca Lazzarini & Elena Ostanel & Naomi Pedri Stocco, 2024. "They Like to Do It in Public: A Quantitative Analysis of Culture-Led Regeneration Projects in ITALY," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Jinliu Chen & Paola Pellegrini & Zhuo Yang & Haoqi Wang, 2023. "Strategies for Sustainable Urban Renewal: Community-Scale GIS-Based Analysis for Densification Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.
    4. Buse Acik Etike & Muyesser Ebru Erdonmez Dincer, 2024. "Determining the Interaction of Social Sustainability with the Physical Environment: A Case Study of Adana, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-26, June.
    5. Yawei Pang & Shaojun Chen & Zhiyang He, 2025. "From Social Stability to Social Sustainability: Comparing SIA and SSRA in an ADB Loan Project in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-24, October.
    6. Jinliu Chen & Haoqi Wang & Zhuo Yang & Pengcheng Li & Geng Ma & Xiaoxin Zhao, 2023. "Comparative Spatial Vitality Evaluation of Traditional Settlements Based on SUF: Taking Anren Ancient Town’s Urban Design as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Wenjun Peng & Dakun Dai & Fuqin Liu & Xu Wang, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity and Socioeconomic Drivers of Landscape Patterns in High-Density Communities of Wuhan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-23, September.
    8. Ruoshi Zhang, 2023. "Evaluation of Emotional Attachment Characteristics of Small-Scale Urban Vitality Space Based on Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution, Integrating Entropy Weight Method and Gr," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-26, March.
    9. Qijing Tang & Zongcai Wei & Shaoqi Huang, 2024. "Residential Satisfaction of Subsidized Housing Estates in Post-Reform China: Roles of the Built and Social Environments," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:10:p:2019-:d:1767187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.