IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i10p1981-d1762974.html

Spatiotemporal Continuity and Spatially Heterogeneous Drivers in the Historical Evolution of County-Scale Carbon Emissions from Territorial Function Utilisation in China: Evidence from Qionglai City

Author

Listed:
  • Dinghua Ou

    (College of Resources, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
    Key Laboratory of Investigation, Monitoring, Protection and Utilization of Cropland Resources, Ministry of Natural Resources, Chengdu 611130, China
    Observation and Research Station of Land Ecology and Land Use in Chengdu Plain, Ministry of Natural Resources, Chengdu 610045, China)

  • Jiayi Wu

    (College of Resources, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Qingyan Huang

    (College of Resources, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Chang Shu

    (College of Resources, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Tianyi Xie

    (College of Resources, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Chunxin Luo

    (College of Resources, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Meng Zhao

    (Faculty of Public Administration, Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan 625014, China)

  • Jiani Zhang

    (College of Resources, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Jianbo Fei

    (College of Resources, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
    Key Laboratory of Investigation, Monitoring, Protection and Utilization of Cropland Resources, Ministry of Natural Resources, Chengdu 611130, China)

Abstract

County-level administrative areas serve as fundamental components in China’s territorial spatial governance, and the precision and consistency of their carbon emission reduction policies are directly linked to the efficacy of the “dual-carbon” strategy’s execution. However, the spatiotemporal evolution characteristics, future trends, and driving factors of carbon emissions from territorial spatial function (TSF) utilisation at the county level remain unclear, posing a fundamental theoretical issue that local governments urgently need to address when formulating carbon reduction policies. This study developed a framework to simulate the spatial distribution of carbon emissions resulting from land use at the county level. It simulated the carbon emissions in Qionglai City from 2009 to 2023, analysed the spatial-temporal evolution characteristics and future trends using global Moran’s I, the Getis-Ord G i * index, and the Hurst index, and employed the Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression (GTWR) model for analysis. The findings indicated the following: (1) From 2009 to 2023, the city’s total carbon emissions increased from 852,300 tonnes to 1,422,500 tonnes, showing a significant phased trend. Among these, rural production spaces (RPSs) were the primary carbon sources, accounting for over 70% of annual carbon emissions each year. (2) County carbon emissions exhibit a pronounced positive geographical correlation and aggregation distribution, characterised by notable regional heterogeneity. (3) From 2009 to 2023, the city’s regional carbon emissions rose dramatically by 65.69%, while 29.66% of the areas experienced negligible increases; 99% of the regions are projected to maintain the historical growth trend, but this continuity exhibits spatial and temporal variations. (4) Economic growth, industrial structure, and development intensity are the core driving factors of carbon emissions at the county level, with spatial variations in their impact. The research findings not only provide a basis for Qionglai City, China, to formulate precise and sustainable carbon reduction policies (such as developing differentiated carbon emission control measures based on the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of carbon emissions and their driving factors), but also offer insights for similar regions worldwide in controlling carbon emissions and addressing global climate change (for example, by optimizing land spatial function utilisation, reducing carbon sources, and maximizing carbon sink capacity).

Suggested Citation

  • Dinghua Ou & Jiayi Wu & Qingyan Huang & Chang Shu & Tianyi Xie & Chunxin Luo & Meng Zhao & Jiani Zhang & Jianbo Fei, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Continuity and Spatially Heterogeneous Drivers in the Historical Evolution of County-Scale Carbon Emissions from Territorial Function Utilisation in China: Evidence from Qionglai City," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-36, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:10:p:1981-:d:1762974
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/10/1981/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/10/1981/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pata, Ugur Korkut & Caglar, Abdullah Emre, 2021. "Investigating the EKC hypothesis with renewable energy consumption, human capital, globalization and trade openness for China: Evidence from augmented ARDL approach with a structural break," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    2. Feng, Tong & Du, Huibin & Zhang, Zengkai & Mi, Zhifu & Guan, Dabo & Zuo, Jian, 2020. "Carbon transfer within China: Insights from production fragmentation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    3. Cui, Xuezhu & Li, Shaoying & Gao, Feng, 2020. "Examining spatial carbon metabolism: Features, future simulation, and land-based mitigation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 438(C).
    4. S. Hogue & D. Roten & E. Marland & G. Marland & T. A. Boden, 2019. "Gridded estimates of CO2 emissions: uncertainty as a function of grid size," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 969-983, August.
    5. Liu, Yansui & Zhou, Yang, 2021. "Territory spatial planning and national governance system in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    6. Yahui Zhang & Jianfeng Li & Siqi Liu & Jizhe Zhou, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Effects and Optimization Strategies of Land-Use Carbon Emissions at the County Scale: A Case Study of Shaanxi Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Shoutiao Li & Zhibang Xu & Haowei Wang, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Factors Driving Exploration of Industrial Carbon-Emission Intensity: A Case Study of Guangdong Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Xuanli Wang & Huifang Yu & Yiqun Wu & Congyue Zhou & Yonghua Li & Xingyu Lai & Jiahao He, 2024. "Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Carbon Emissions and Their Influencing Factors at the County Scale: A Case Study of Zhejiang Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-25, March.
    9. Li, Sinan & Zhao, Xiaoqing & Pu, Junwei & Miao, Peipei & Wang, Qian & Tan, Kun, 2021. "Optimize and control territorial spatial functional areas to improve the ecological stability and total environment in karst areas of Southwest China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    10. Runchen Zhou & Yang Guo & Yuzhe Wu, 2023. "Exploration on the Innovation Model of County Urbanization Development with the Resource Constraints in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-22, November.
    11. Liu, Yisheng & Yang, Meng & Cheng, Feiyu & Tian, Jinzhao & Du, Zhuoqun & Song, Pengbo, 2022. "Analysis of regional differences and decomposition of carbon emissions in China based on generalized divisia index method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    12. Juan Li & Aifeng Liu, 2022. "Impact of Urbanization on Total Factor Carbon Productivity in Central Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    13. Shilong Piao & Jingyun Fang & Philippe Ciais & Philippe Peylin & Yao Huang & Stephen Sitch & Tao Wang, 2009. "The carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems in China," Nature, Nature, vol. 458(7241), pages 1009-1013, April.
    14. Zhoumu Yang & Jingjing Cai & Yun Lu & Bin Zhang, 2022. "The Impact of Economic Growth, Industrial Transition, and Energy Intensity on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, April.
    15. Mielniczuk, J. & Wojdyllo, P., 2007. "Estimation of Hurst exponent revisited," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(9), pages 4510-4525, May.
    16. Jifei Zhang & Chunyan Liu & Fei Chang, 2019. "A New Approach for Multifunctional Zoning of Territorial Space: The Panxi Area of the Upper Yangtze River in China Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dinghua Ou & Qi Zhang & Yijie Wu & Jing Qin & Jianguo Xia & Ouping Deng & Xuesong Gao & Jinhu Bian & Shangqi Gong, 2021. "Construction of a Territorial Space Classification System Based on Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity of Land Use and Its Superior Territorial Space Functions and Their Dynamic Coupling: Case Study on Qionglai City of Sichuan Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-27, August.
    2. Xinmei Wang & Dinghua Ou & Chang Shu & Yiliang Liu & Zijia Yan & Maocuo La & Jianguo Xia, 2025. "How Can We Achieve Carbon Neutrality During Urban Expansion? An Empirical Study from Qionglai City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-35, August.
    3. Zhang, Zuo & Li, Jiaming, 2022. "Spatial suitability and multi-scenarios for land use: Simulation and policy insights from the production-living-ecological perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Zhang, Jing & Li, Sinan & Lin, Naifa & Lin, Yue & Yuan, Shaofeng & Zhang, Ling & Zhu, Jinxia & Wang, Ke & Gan, Muye & Zhu, Congmou, 2022. "Spatial identification and trade-off analysis of land use functions improve spatial zoning management in rapid urbanized areas, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    5. Yunlu Jiang & Haotian He & Haoyu Zhang & Yuee Cao & Ge Shi & Lin Feng & Jianjun Yang, 2023. "Study on the Evolution and Optimization of the Spatial Structure of the Oasis in the Arid Area: A Case Study of the Aksu River Basin in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-22, March.
    6. Dinghua Ou & Xiaofan Cheng & Zijia Yan & Kun Ruan & Qingyan Huang & Zhi Zhao & Ziheng Yang & Jing Qin & Jianguo Xia, 2025. "Territorial Functional Pattern Reconstruction Integrating Set-Theoretic and Functional Mappings with Game-Theoretic Analysis to Reconcile Development and Conservation in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-38, October.
    7. Yanbo, Qu & Shilei, Wang & Yaya, Tian & Guanghui, Jiang & Tao, Zhou & Liang, Meng, 2023. "Territorial spatial planning for regional high-quality development – An analytical framework for the identification, mediation and transmission of potential land utilization conflicts in the Yellow River Delta," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    8. Zhao, Xiaoqing & Xu, Yifei & Pu, Junwei & Tao, Junyi & Chen, Yanjun & Huang, Pei & Shi, Xinyu & Ran, Yuju & Gu, Zexian, 2024. "Achieving the supply-demand balance of ecosystem services through zoning regulation based on land use thresholds," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    9. Mengmeng Liu & Hao Wu & Haopeng Wang, 2023. "Will Trade Protection Trigger a Surge in Investment-Related CO 2 Emissions? Evidence from Multi-Regional Input–Output Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    10. Jiaxing Cui & Han Jin & Xuesong Kong & Jianwei Sun & Yawen Peng & Yuanyuan Zhu, 2024. "Territorial Spatial Resilience Assessment and Its Optimisation Path: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, August.
    11. Jiuyi Li, 2022. "Evaluation Methods for Water Resource Suitability in Territorial Spatial Planning: A Case Study of Baiyin City in a Semi-Arid Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-20, October.
    12. Hyunsoo Kang, 2022. "Impacts of Income Inequality and Economic Growth on CO 2 Emissions: Comparing the Gini Coefficient and the Top Income Share in OECD Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, September.
    13. Jinxia Wang & Yunfeng Tan & Qiong Hu & Huarong Cheng & Fang Gao, 2024. "Research on talent cultivation for rural revitalization based on three-party evolutionary game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-20, November.
    14. Jikun Jiang & Shenglai Zhu & Weihao Wang, 2022. "Carbon Emissions, Economic Growth, Urbanization, and Foreign Trade in China: Empirical Evidence from ARDL Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, August.
    15. Hongyang Qiao & Sanmang Wu, 2025. "Decoupling Factor Analysis for Sustainable Development in China’s Four Municipalities Using the Tapio Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-26, March.
    16. Huicai Yang & Shuqin Zhao & Zhanfei Qin & Zhiguo Qi & Xinying Jiao & Zhen Li, 2024. "Differentiation of Carbon Sink Enhancement Potential in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, March.
    17. Kui Ying & Lin Ha & Yaohua Kuang & Jinhong Ding, 2024. "Population Distribution in Guizhou’s Mountainous Cities: Evolution of Spatial Pattern and Driving Factors," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, September.
    18. Faik Bilgili & Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente & Sevda Kuşkaya & Mohammed Alnour & Seyit Önderol & Mohammad Enamul Hoque, 2024. "Are research and development on energy efficiency and energy sources effective in the level of CO2 emissions? Fresh evidence from EU data," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 24183-24219, September.
    19. Liu, Yaping & Sadiq, Farah & Ali, Wajahat & Kumail, Tafazal, 2022. "Does tourism development, energy consumption, trade openness and economic growth matters for ecological footprint: Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve and pollution haven hypothesis for Pakistan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    20. Ma, Shenglan & Huang, Junlin & Wang, Xiuxiu & Fu, Ying, 2025. "Multi-scenario simulation of low-carbon land use based on the SD-FLUS model in Changsha, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:10:p:1981-:d:1762974. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.