Author
Listed:
- Sara La Cava
(Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Forestry and Wood, 87036 Rende, Italy
National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), 90133 Palermo, Italy)
- Margherita Lombardo
(Department of Computer, Modeling, Electronic, and System Engineering (DIMES), University of Calabria, 87036 Rende, Italy)
- Vincenzo Bernardini
(Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Forestry and Wood, 87036 Rende, Italy)
- Federica Fumo
(Department of Biology, Ecology and Earth Sciences (DIBEST), University of Calabria, 87036 Rende, Italy)
- Giuseppe Rijllo
(Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Forestry and Wood, 87036 Rende, Italy
National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), 90133 Palermo, Italy)
- Rosario Turco
(Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Forestry and Wood, 87036 Rende, Italy)
- Laura Bevacqua
(Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Forestry and Wood, 87036 Rende, Italy)
- Giada Zucco
(Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Forestry and Wood, 87036 Rende, Italy)
- Stefano Scalercio
(Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Forestry and Wood, 87036 Rende, Italy
National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), 90133 Palermo, Italy)
Abstract
Landscape configuration and forest structure assume an increasing importance as determinants of animal communities. This paper focused on nocturnal Lepidoptera inhabiting alder patches in the Sila National Park, Italy. According to their shapes, patches were divided into linear and compact ones to disentangle the roles of forest structure and landscape configuration in determining the composition of nocturnal Lepidopteran communities at different observation scales. We used the Mann–Whitney test for medians and Shannon diversity, equitability, Fisher’s alpha, and nestedness to test differences among moth communities. We found that compact patches inhabited richer and more abundant communities. The abundance-based Correspondence Analysis showed moth communities clustered according to woodlot shape, except a compact woodlot with a linear-like moth community because it was entirely surrounded by grasslands. Percentage of forested area and abundance and composition of communities were positively correlated at 50 and 200 m buffers, while correlations were absent at smaller and larger buffers. Our results demonstrated that a width of 50 m may not be sufficient to give proper functionality to the wooded area, at least for moths. As a consequence, planning of forest restorations should consider the importance of increasing the structural habitat continuity at larger scales.
Suggested Citation
Sara La Cava & Margherita Lombardo & Vincenzo Bernardini & Federica Fumo & Giuseppe Rijllo & Rosario Turco & Laura Bevacqua & Giada Zucco & Stefano Scalercio, 2023.
"Compact vs. Linear: Effects of Forest Structure, Patch Shape and Landscape Configuration on Black Alder Macromoth Communities,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:9:p:1670-:d:1226073
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:9:p:1670-:d:1226073. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.