IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i6p1160-d1160730.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changes in Soil Sulphur Fractions as Influenced by Nutrient Management Practices in Mulberry

Author

Listed:
  • Dhaneshwar Padhan

    (Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute, Mysuru 570008, India)

  • Dhanushree Shivaraj

    (Department of Chemistry, JSS Science and Technology University, Mysuru 570008, India)

  • Akshitha Doddagenigera Nagaraja

    (Department of Chemistry, JSS Science and Technology University, Mysuru 570008, India)

  • Pragyan Paramita Rout

    (Department of Soil Science & Agricultural Chemistry, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar 751003, India)

  • C. M. Babu

    (Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute, Mysuru 570008, India)

  • Ravindra Aurade

    (Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute, Mysuru 570008, India)

  • Sobhana Velayudhan

    (Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute, Mysuru 570008, India)

  • Babulal

    (Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute, Mysuru 570008, India)

Abstract

Sulphur (S) plays a vital role in improving the quality of mulberry leaves because of its involvement in protein synthesis. The knowledge of different pools of S in soils and its bioavailability for mulberry nutrition is thus, required for optimizing S fertilization. Hence, the present study was designed to ascertain the influence of chemical fertilizer and farmyard manure (both are S sources) on S fractions and its bioavailability in soils. In this regard, four nutrient management practices viz., control (without any chemical fertilizers and organic manures), recommended doses of N, P and K fertilizers (100% RDF), 80% RDF, 60% RDF with four mulberry varieties viz., V-1, G-4, AGB-8 and MSG-2 besides a fallow were considered for the study. Furthermore, the bioavailability of S in soils was tested using four commonly used chemical extractants viz., CaCl 2 , NaHCO 3 , AB-DTPA and Mehlich-3 (with different modes and chemistry of extraction). Organic S was the dominant fraction in the experimental soils accounting for 94.7% of total soil S while the inorganic fraction constituted only 5.3% that includes water soluble, sorbed and carbonate occluded S. Lowest amount of organic S content in soils of unmanured control (579.6 mg kg −1 ) was observed while the 100% RDF treatment (673.2 mg kg −1 ) maintained a higher content of soil organic S. High amount of sorbed and occluded S was observed in control plot compared to other fertilizer treatments (100% RDF, 80% RDF and 60% RDF). There was a gradual decline in soil S fractions when the fertilizer inputs were reduced to 60% suggesting that recommended doses of fertilizer inputs could maintain the soil S fractions. In addition, the extractable fractions of S were influenced by the fertilizer application rates and the extractability of all four extractants decreased with the reduction in fertilizer inputs. The amount of S extracted by all four chemical extractants followed the order of NaHCO 3 > Mehlich-3 > AB-DTPA > CaCl 2 across the tested soils. Dynamic relationships among the extractants indicated that they could extract the S from the same pools in soil. Of the four extractants tested for evaluating plant available S, Mehlich-3 showed a higher degree of correlations with plant tissue S concentration and applied S through chemical fertilizers and farmyard manure. Furthermore, it could maintain strong correlations with water soluble and organic S fractions which were found to contribute significantly to plant S concentration. Thus, Mehlich-3 can be recommended for the assessment of bioavailable S for the nutrition of mulberry.

Suggested Citation

  • Dhaneshwar Padhan & Dhanushree Shivaraj & Akshitha Doddagenigera Nagaraja & Pragyan Paramita Rout & C. M. Babu & Ravindra Aurade & Sobhana Velayudhan & Babulal, 2023. "Changes in Soil Sulphur Fractions as Influenced by Nutrient Management Practices in Mulberry," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:6:p:1160-:d:1160730
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/6/1160/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/6/1160/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rubina Yesmin & Mahmud Hossain & Mohammad Golam Kibria & Mohammad Jahiruddin & Zakaria M. Solaiman & Shaikh Mohammad Bokhtiar & Md Baktear Hossain & Md Abdus Satter & Md Anwarul Abedin, 2021. "Evaluation of Critical Limit of Sulphur in Soils for Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) and Mustard ( Brassica napus L.)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-13, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:6:p:1160-:d:1160730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.