IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i2p379-d1052142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Unsupervised Burned Area Mapping Approach Using Sentinel-2 Images

Author

Listed:
  • Michail Sismanis

    (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, 6th km Charilaou-Thermi Rd., 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Rizos-Theodoros Chadoulis

    (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, 6th km Charilaou-Thermi Rd., 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Ioannis Manakos

    (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, 6th km Charilaou-Thermi Rd., 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Anastasios Drosou

    (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, 6th km Charilaou-Thermi Rd., 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)

Abstract

The frequency and severity of large, destructive fires have increased in the recent past, with extended impacts on the landscape, the human population, and ecosystems. Earth observations provide a means for the frequent, wide coverage and accurate monitoring of fire impacts. This study describes an unsupervised approach for the mapping of burned areas from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery, which is based on multispectral thresholding, and introduces an adaptive thresholding method. It takes into account the localized variability of the spectral responses in a two-phase approach. The first phase detects areas that are burned with a high probability, while the second phase adaptively adjusts this preliminary mapping by expanding and refining its boundaries. The resulting classification contains two main classes of interest: burned and unburned. The latter is further classified into four (4) fire impact severity classes, according to the Copernicus Emergency Management Service (CEMS) and the NASA United States Geological Survey (USGS)’s widely acknowledged nomenclature examples. Three distinct wildfire events are assessed, which occurred during the summers of 2020 and 2021 in Greece and Portugal. The classification accuracy is calculated by juxtaposing the classification outputs to burned area validation maps created through the photointerpretation of very high-resolution (VHR) satellite imagery. The corresponding CEMS On-Demand Mapping products are also juxtaposed against the validation maps for comparison purposes. The accuracy assessment showcases that the unsupervised approach closely follows the capacity provided by the CEMS maps (e.g., the kappa coefficient— k —of the proposed unsupervised approach is 0.91, 0.83 and 0.83 for the events processed, while the CEMS products achieve a k of 0.94, 0.93 and 0.8, respectively). The proposed approach considers the variability of the affected areas’ spectral response; thus, it generalizes well to different areas, e.g., areas characterized by different land cover types. It seems to offer an effective means of mapping the wildfire-induced changes, which can be further incorporated and used by forest fire management services and further decision support systems complementary to the CEMS maps.

Suggested Citation

  • Michail Sismanis & Rizos-Theodoros Chadoulis & Ioannis Manakos & Anastasios Drosou, 2023. "An Unsupervised Burned Area Mapping Approach Using Sentinel-2 Images," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:379-:d:1052142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/379/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/379/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marta Milczarek & Sebastian Aleksandrowicz & Afroditi Kita & Rizos-Theodoros Chadoulis & Ioannis Manakos & Edyta Woźniak, 2023. "Object- Versus Pixel-Based Unsupervised Fire Burn Scar Mapping under Different Biogeographical Conditions in Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:379-:d:1052142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.