IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2022i1p33-d1011618.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applicability Analysis of GF-2PMS and PLANETSCOPE Data for Ground Object Recognition in Karst Region

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Zhang

    (College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Chaoyong Shen

    (College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
    Guizhou Academy of Sciences, Guiyang 550009, China
    The Third Surveying and Mapping Institute of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 550004, China)

  • Shaoqi Zhou

    (College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Ruidong Yang

    (College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Xuling Luo

    (The Third Surveying and Mapping Institute of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 550004, China)

  • Guanglai Zhu

    (College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China)

Abstract

Remote sensing image with high spatial and temporal resolution is very important for rational planning and scientific management of land resources. However, due to the influence of satellite resolution, revisit period, and cloud pollution, it is difficult to obtain high spatial and temporal resolution images. In order to effectively solve the “space–time contradiction” problem in remote sensing application, based on GF-2PMS (GF-2) and PlanetSope (PS) data, this paper compares and analyzes the applicability of FSDAF (flexible spatiotemporal data fusion), STDFA (the spatial temporal data fusion approach), and Fit_FC (regression model fitting, spatial filtering, and residual compensation) in different terrain conditions in karst area. The results show the following. (1) For the boundary area of water and land, the FSDAF model has the best fusion effect in land boundary recognition, and provides rich ground object information. The Fit_FC model is less effective, and the image is blurry. (2) For areas such as mountains, with large changes in vegetation coverage, the spatial resolution of the images fused by the three models is significantly improved. Among them, the STDFA model has the clearest and richest spatial structure information. The fused image of the Fit_FC model has the highest similarity with the verification image, which can better restore the coverage changes of crops and other vegetation, but the actual spatial resolution of the fused image is relatively poor, the image quality is fuzzy, and the land boundary area cannot be clearly identified. (3) For areas with dense buildings, such as cities, the fusion image of the FSDAF and STDFA models is clearer and the Fit_FC model can better reflect the changes in land use. In summary, compared with the Fit_FC model, the FSDAF model and the STDFA model have higher image prediction accuracy, especially in the recognition of building contours and other surface features, but they are not suitable for the dynamic monitoring of vegetation such as crops. At the same time, the image resolution of the Fit_FC model after fusion is slightly lower than that of the other two models. In particular, in the water–land boundary area, the fusion accuracy is poor, but the model of Fit_FC has unique advantages in vegetation dynamic monitoring. In this paper, three spatiotemporal fusion models are used to fuse GF-2 and PS images, which improves the recognition accuracy of surface objects and provides a new idea for fine classification of land use in karst areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Zhang & Chaoyong Shen & Shaoqi Zhou & Ruidong Yang & Xuling Luo & Guanglai Zhu, 2022. "Applicability Analysis of GF-2PMS and PLANETSCOPE Data for Ground Object Recognition in Karst Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:33-:d:1011618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/33/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/33/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:33-:d:1011618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.