IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i9p1419-d900378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Affects the Use Flexibility of Pocket Parks? Evidence from Nanjing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Conghui Zhou

    (School of Architecture, Southeast University, 2 Sipailou Road, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Meng Xie

    (School of Architecture, Southeast University, 2 Sipailou Road, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Jin Zhao

    (School of Architecture, Southeast University, 2 Sipailou Road, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Yihuan An

    (School of Architecture, Southeast University, 2 Sipailou Road, Nanjing 210096, China)

Abstract

The use flexibility of pocket parks is one of the essential factors that determine their service compatibility, efficiency, and attraction for park users in densely populated cities. To examine the factors that affect the use flexibility of pocket parks, we collected data on the periodic use of 74 pocket parks through a field survey in Nanjing and adopted the Shannon Wiener diversity index to quantitatively measure this variable. After using a multiple regression model series, we examined the internal and surrounding factors that affect the use flexibility of pocket parks on weekdays and weekends, respectively, and compared them with those that affect the use intensity of pocket parks. The results showed that paved ground and the mixed use of surrounding land promoted both use flexibility and intensity of pocket parks. Boundary buildings and surrounding residents only promoted their use flexibility, while tree canopies and exercising facilities only promoted the use intensity of pocket parks. A significant correlation ( p < 0.05) was also found between the use flexibility and intensity on weekdays. These findings can contribute to future decisions regarding pocket park planning and design in Nanjing and similar cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Conghui Zhou & Meng Xie & Jin Zhao & Yihuan An, 2022. "What Affects the Use Flexibility of Pocket Parks? Evidence from Nanjing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1419-:d:900378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1419/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1419/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karin K. Peschardt & Ulrika K. Stigsdotter & Jasper Schipperrijn, 2016. "Identifying Features of Pocket Parks that May Be Related to Health Promoting Use," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 79-94, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tomasz Bajwoluk & Piotr Langer, 2023. "The Pocket Park and Its Impact on the Quality of Urban Space on the Local and Supralocal Scale—Case Study of Krakow, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Steele & Edda Bild & Cynthia Tarlao & Catherine Guastavino, 2019. "Soundtracking the Public Space: Outcomes of the Musikiosk Soundscape Intervention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-38, May.
    2. Jorge H. Amorim & Magnuz Engardt & Christer Johansson & Isabel Ribeiro & Magnus Sannebro, 2021. "Regulating and Cultural Ecosystem Services of Urban Green Infrastructure in the Nordic Countries: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Huiyun Peng & Xiangjin Li & Tingting Yang & Shaohua Tan, 2023. "Research on the Relationship between the Environmental Characteristics of Pocket Parks and Young People’s Perception of the Restorative Effects—A Case Study Based on Chongqing City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Shan Lu & Wonseok Oh & Ryozo Ooka & Lijun Wang, 2022. "Effects of Environmental Features in Small Public Urban Green Spaces on Older Adults’ Mental Restoration: Evidence from Tokyo," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-22, April.
    5. Dorota Sikora & Małgorzata Kaczyńska, 2022. "The Cultural Ecosystem Services as an Element Supporting Manor Landscape Protection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-33, June.
    6. Anita Kwartnik-Pruc & Anna Trembecka, 2021. "Public Green Space Policy Implementation: A Case Study of Krakow, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    7. Xinxin Wang & Susan Rodiek, 2019. "Older Adults’ Preference for Landscape Features Along Urban Park Walkways in Nanjing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-22, October.
    8. Iman Saeedi & Elham Dabbagh, 2021. "Modeling the relationships between hardscape color and user satisfaction in urban parks," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 6535-6552, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1419-:d:900378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.