IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i8p1171-d873426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Could Purposefully Engineered Native Grassland Gardens Enhance Urban Insect Biodiversity?

Author

Listed:
  • Christina A. Breed

    (Department of Architecture, School of the Built Environment, Faculty of Engineering, Built Environment and Information Technology, Hatfield Campus, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0028, South Africa)

  • Agata Morelli

    (Department of Zoology and Entomology, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0028, South Africa)

  • Christian W. W. Pirk

    (Department of Zoology and Entomology, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0028, South Africa)

  • Catherine L. Sole

    (Department of Zoology and Entomology, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0028, South Africa)

  • Marié J. Du Toit

    (Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, School of Biological Sciences: Botany, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, Potchefstroom Campus, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2531, South Africa)

  • Sarel S. Cilliers

    (Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, School of Biological Sciences: Botany, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, Potchefstroom Campus, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2531, South Africa)

Abstract

Progress is required in response to how cities can support greater biodiversity. This calls for more research on how landscape designers can actively shape urban ecologies to deliver context-specific empirical bases for green space intervention decisions. Design experiments offer opportunities for implemented projects within real-world settings to serve as learning sites. This paper explores preliminary ecological outcomes from a multidisciplinary team on whether purposefully engineered native grassland gardens provide more habitat functions for insects than mainstream gardens in the City of Tshwane, South Africa. Six different sites were sampled: two recently installed native grassland garden interventions (young native), two contemporary non-native control gardens (young non-native) on the same premises and of the same ages as the interventions, one remnant of a more pristine native grassland reference area (old native), and one long-established, non-native reference garden (old non-native). Plant and insect diversity were sampled over one year. The short-term findings suggest that higher plant beta diversity (species turnover indicating heterogeneity in a site) supports greater insect richness and evenness in richness. Garden size, age, and connectivity were not clear factors mediating urban habitat enhancement. Based on the preliminary results, the researchers recommend high native grassland species composition and diversity, avoiding individual species dominance, but increasing beta diversity and functional types when selecting garden plants for urban insect biodiversity conservation in grassland biomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Christina A. Breed & Agata Morelli & Christian W. W. Pirk & Catherine L. Sole & Marié J. Du Toit & Sarel S. Cilliers, 2022. "Could Purposefully Engineered Native Grassland Gardens Enhance Urban Insect Biodiversity?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:1171-:d:873426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/8/1171/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/8/1171/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:1171-:d:873426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.