IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i5p739-d815819.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating Road Mortality Hotspots While Accounting for Imperfect Detection: A Case Study with Amphibians and Reptiles

Author

Listed:
  • Noah Hallisey

    (Department of Natural Resources Science, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA)

  • Scott W. Buchanan

    (Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management, Division of Fish and Wildlife, 277 Great Neck Road, West Kingston, RI 02892, USA)

  • Brian D. Gerber

    (Department of Natural Resources Science, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA)

  • Liam S. Corcoran

    (Department of Natural Resources Science, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA)

  • Nancy E. Karraker

    (Department of Natural Resources Science, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA)

Abstract

Wildlife road mortality tends to aggregate spatially at locations commonly referred to as road mortality hotspots. Predictive models can be used to identify locations appropriate for mitigation measures that reduce road mortality. However, the influence of imperfect detection (e.g., false absences) during road mortality surveys can lead to inaccurate or imprecise spatial patterns of road mortality hotspots and suboptimal implementation of mitigation measures. In this research, we used amphibians and reptiles as a case study to address imperfect detection issues when estimating the probability of road mortality hotspots using occupancy detection modeling. In addition, we determined the survey effort needed to achieve a high probability of detecting large roadkill events. We also assessed whether vehicle travel reductions associated with the COVID-19 pandemic travel restrictions led to reductions in road mortality. We conducted surveys at 48 sites throughout Rhode Island, USA, from 2019–2021. In total, we observed 657 carcasses representing 19 of Rhode Island’s 37 native species. Of the 19 native species, eight species of frogs, four species of salamanders, four species of snakes, and three species of turtles were observed. We documented a reduction in roadkill density and the proportion of dead versus live amphibians and reptiles in pandemic years (2020 and 2021), but we were unable to link reductions in roadkill density to reductions in traffic volume. Our model results indicated that large roadkill events were more likely to occur on roads near wetlands and with low traffic volume and were more likely to be detected as daily precipitation increased. We determined that there was a low probability of detecting large roadkill events, suggesting that imperfect detection influences detection of large roadkill events, and many were likely missed during our surveys. Therefore, we recommend using occupancy modeling to account for the influence of imperfect detection when estimating road mortality hotspots. This approach will more effectively guide the implementation of mitigation measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Noah Hallisey & Scott W. Buchanan & Brian D. Gerber & Liam S. Corcoran & Nancy E. Karraker, 2022. "Estimating Road Mortality Hotspots While Accounting for Imperfect Detection: A Case Study with Amphibians and Reptiles," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:5:p:739-:d:815819
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/5/739/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/5/739/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gu Ho Seol & Eun Bum Kim & Ye Eun Kim & Nam Choon Kim & Hyun Kim, 2023. "A Design Proposal for an Eco-Tunnel for Anurans Based on Behavioral Experiments and Species Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:5:p:739-:d:815819. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.