IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i8p862-d615825.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Land Administration in Ecuador Based on the Fit-for-Purpose Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Dimo Todorovski

    (Faculty ITC, University of Twente, 7514 AE Enschede, The Netherlands)

  • Rodolfo Salazar

    (Department of Earth Sciences and Construction, University of the Armed Forces ESPE, Sangolqui 171103, Ecuador)

  • Ginella Jacome

    (Department of Earth Sciences and Construction, University of the Armed Forces ESPE, Sangolqui 171103, Ecuador)

Abstract

Land administration is established to manage the people-to-land relationship. However, it is believed that 70% of the land in developing countries is unregistered. In the case of Ecuador, the government has an ambitious strategy to implement a national cadaster on the full territory in a short time period. Therefore, the objective of this study was the assessment of land administration in Ecuador based on the fit-for-purpose approach as an assessment framework. A literature review was performed on the topic of land administration, including guidelines for improvement and assessment frameworks. The basic concept of fit-for-purpose land administration was reviewed with the three frameworks, which are: spatial, legal, and institutional. Interviews and focus group discussions were performed in Ecuador for collecting primary and secondary data about land administration in this country. Results from these activities are presented and discussed using the structure of the basic concept of fit-for-purpose land administration with the three frameworks. It was found that during the field data collection precise land survey of fixed boundaries was performed and around 55–60 attributes per parcel were collected as a part of the field land survey in Ecuador. Based on the findings, discussions were developed, and a score table was created identifying which principles should be addressed if rapid mapping and land registration are desired by the government of Ecuador to be implemented on the whole territory in a short time period. Finally, the paper ends with conclusions and recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimo Todorovski & Rodolfo Salazar & Ginella Jacome, 2021. "Assessment of Land Administration in Ecuador Based on the Fit-for-Purpose Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:8:p:862-:d:615825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/8/862/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/8/862/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Bank, 2015. "Land Governance Assessment Framework," World Bank Publications - Reports 28508, The World Bank Group.
    2. Serene Ho & Pranab R. Choudhury & Nivedita Haran & Rebecca Leshinsky, 2021. "Decentralization as a Strategy to Scale Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration: An Indian Perspective on Institutional Challenges," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stig Enemark & Robin McLaren & Christiaan Lemmen, 2021. "Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration—Providing Secure Land Rights at Scale," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-12, September.
    2. Vlad Păunescu & Divyani Kohli & Alexandru-Iulian Iliescu & Mircea-Emil Nap & Elemer-Emanuel Șuba & Tudor Sălăgean, 2022. "An Evaluation of the National Program of Systematic Land Registration in Romania Using the Fit for Purpose Spatial Framework Principles," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Gaspar Mora-Navarro & Carmen Femenia-Ribera & Joan Manuel Velilla Torres & Jose Martinez-Llario, 2022. "Geographical Data and Metadata on Land Administration in Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Mekonnen Tesfaye Metaferia & Rohan Mark Bennett & Berhanu Kefale Alemie & Mila Koeva, 2022. "Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration and the Framework for Effective Land Administration: Synthesis of Contemporary Experiences," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evert Waeterloos, 2021. "Introducing Collaborative Governance in Decentralized Land Administration and Management in South Africa: District Land Reform Committees Viewed through a ‘System of Innovation’ Lens," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Ana García-Morán & Simon Ulvund & Eva-Maria Unger & Rohan Mark Bennett, 2021. "Exploring PPPs in Support of Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration: A Case Study from Côte d’Ivoire," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Uma Shankar Panday & Raja Ram Chhatkuli & Janak Raj Joshi & Jagat Deuja & Danilo Antonio & Stig Enemark, 2021. "Securing Land Rights for All through Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration Approach: The Case of Nepal," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    4. Stig Enemark & Robin McLaren & Christiaan Lemmen, 2021. "Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration—Providing Secure Land Rights at Scale," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-12, September.
    5. Casiano Flores, Cesar & Tan, Evrim & Buntinx, Ine & Crompvoets, Joep & Stöcker, Claudia & Zevenbergen, Jaap, 2020. "Governance assessment of the UAVs implementation in Rwanda under the fit-for-purpose land administration approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    6. Charisse Griffith-Charles, 2021. "Application of FFPLA to Achieve Economically Beneficial Outcomes Post Disaster in the Caribbean," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:8:p:862-:d:615825. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.