IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i6p659-d579077.html

Exploring the Distribution of Gardens in Suzhou City in the Qianlong Period through a Space Syntax Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Jiayan Yun

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, 159 Longpan Rd., Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Wenbo Yu

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, 159 Longpan Rd., Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Hao Wang

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, 159 Longpan Rd., Nanjing 210037, China)

Abstract

This study explored the spatial distribution of Suzhou gardens in the Qianlong period (AD 1736–1796) through an innovative method combining spatial syntax and historical textual analysis. Through a spatial syntax approach, a street axis model analysis suggested that the greater the degree of integration and prosperity of a street, the denser the distribution of gardens surrounding it. A canal axis model analysis indicated that more gardens were built around canals that were less integrated and had less traffic. The accuracy and reliability of the axis model analysis results were validated using historical documents and images. The following was observed: (1) Gardens were densely distributed in the prosperous commercial areas at the northern and southern ends of Suzhou City. The more prosperous the location of a garden, the greater the influence on its popularity. (2) Gardens were concentrated in residential areas with booming businesses. (3) Large numbers of gardens were built along canals with poor traffic functions. Building gardens by diverting water into them reflected the complementary relationship between urban geographical characteristics and garden-building techniques. (4) Gardens promoted commercial development, and commerce drove the preservation and continuation of gardens. The findings revealed the complementary relationship between garden preservation and commercial development.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiayan Yun & Wenbo Yu & Hao Wang, 2021. "Exploring the Distribution of Gardens in Suzhou City in the Qianlong Period through a Space Syntax Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:6:p:659-:d:579077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/6/659/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/6/659/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tiantian Zhang & Zefeng Lian, 2021. "Research on the Distribution and Scale Evolution of Suzhou Gardens under the Urbanization Process from the Tang to the Qing Dynasty," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Jiayan Yun & Joonhyun Kim, 2019. "Sociocultural factors of the late Ming and early Qing Chinese garden landscape, based on philosophies seen in , , and," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 174-185, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jie Bai & Wenzheng Zhang & Roland Chih-Hung Lin & Chunyan Zhang & Tao Xu & Padma Sundar Maharjan, 2024. "The Role of Cultural Landscape in Shaping the Urban Spatial Context of Changzhou (1843–2021) from a Spatial Syntax Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Weiwen Li & Chi Gao, 2023. "Research on Changsha Gardens in Ming Dynasty, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenzheng Zhang & Zexin Lei & Ruiqi Song & Xidong Ma & Yike Hu, 2025. "The identification between cognition and reality: the mountain geography of Nanjing in the Southern Song Dynasty (1127–1279) in China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Mengyuan Xu & Yuanyu Wang & Haitao Yu, 2025. "Realms of aesthetic experience of classical Chinese gardens based on semantic analysis of online tourism reviews," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Jun Jiang & Tongguang Zang & Jianglong Xing & Konomi Ikebe, 2023. "Spatial Distribution of Urban Heritage and Landscape Approach to Urban Contextual Continuity: The Case of Suzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Hanzheng Lin & Jia-Bing Wang & Xuewei Zhang & Fangbing Hu & Jiang Liu & Xin-Chen Hong, 2024. "Historical sensing: the spatial pattern of soundscape occurrences recorded in poems between the Tang and the Qing Dynasties amid urbanization," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-27, December.
    5. Yong Huang & Michael Edward Meadows, 2025. "Challenges to the Sustainability of Urban Cultural Heritage in the Anthropocene: The Case of Suzhou, Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, April.
    6. Jun Jiang & Tiancheng Zhou & Yirui Han & Konomi Ikebe, 2022. "Urban Heritage Conservation and Modern Urban Development from the Perspective of the Historic Urban Landscape Approach: A Case Study of Suzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Weiwen Li & Chi Gao, 2023. "Research on Changsha Gardens in Ming Dynasty, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:6:p:659-:d:579077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.