IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i12p1327-d693792.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attractiveness of Central Public Spaces in Small Polish Towns Based on a Spatial Order Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Wioletta Kamińska

    (Institute of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Jan Kochanowski University, 25-406 Kielce, Poland)

  • Mirosław Mularczyk

    (Institute of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Jan Kochanowski University, 25-406 Kielce, Poland)

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to evaluate the attractiveness of centrally located public spaces (main squares) in select new small towns in Poland. The evaluation was conducted from the spatial order perspective. Spatial order is composed of five elements: architectural and urban planning, functional, aesthetic, social, and “green” orders. The new small towns included in this analysis are settlement units, which in 2020 were populated by up to 20,000 inhabitants and received municipal rights in the 21st century. We used the point bonitation method in our research based on the source material collected during a field study. A total of 286 inventory cards of buildings and nine cards of town squares were compiled. The analysis demonstrated that the main squares in the towns studied are characterised by low or average levels of attractiveness from the spatial order perspective. The architectural–urban planning order in the towns in question was related to the number of inhabitants as well as the period over which a given settlement unit had municipal rights. A larger number of inhabitants had a positive influence on the functional diversification of the central squares and their development, whereas a small number limited both the functional diversification and the number of small architectural elements found at the square. The social order in the given towns was not connected to the number of inhabitants. The elements of social order were assessed favourably, both in larger towns that revitalised their central squares and in smaller settlements. The aesthetic and green orders were strongly related to the revitalisation of public space.

Suggested Citation

  • Wioletta Kamińska & Mirosław Mularczyk, 2021. "Attractiveness of Central Public Spaces in Small Polish Towns Based on a Spatial Order Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-30, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:12:p:1327-:d:693792
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/12/1327/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/12/1327/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agnieszka Szczepańska & Katarzyna Pietrzyk, 2020. "An Evaluation of Public Spaces with the Use of Direct and Remote Methods," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-21, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Krystyna Kurowska & Cezary Kowalczyk, 2022. "Rural Space Modeling—Contemporary Challenges," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-5, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yunjing Wu & Jing Wang & Sunnie Sing-Yeung Lau & Stephen Siu Yu Lau & Yijia Miao, 2022. "An Improved Publicness Assessment Tool Based on a Combined Spatial Model: Case Study of Guangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-27, November.
    2. Le Zhang & Xiaoxiao Xu & Yanlong Guo, 2022. "Comprehensive Evaluation of the Implementation Effect of Commercial Street Quality Improvement Based on AHP-Entropy Weight Method—Taking Hefei Shuanggang Old Street as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:12:p:1327-:d:693792. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.