IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjopen/v9y2025i1p1-d1825346.html

Spider Test Modified for Pickleball: Reliable, but Do Not Use It

Author

Listed:
  • Margaret J. Falknor

    (Kinesiology Department, Cal State Monterey Bay, Seaside, CA 93955, USA)

  • Eric A. Martin

    (Kinesiology Department, Cal State Monterey Bay, Seaside, CA 93955, USA)

  • Steven B. Kim

    (Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Cal State Monterey Bay, Seaside, CA 93955, USA)

Abstract

Change in direction ability (COD) is a fitness component that may be related to safe and effective participation in pickleball. The general aim of the research was to examine a COD test that may be specific to the movement demands of the sport. Therefore, we tested the inter-trial reliability of the modified spider test for pickleball, compared learning effects between younger and older adults, and examined the reliability and validity of hand timing compared to timing gates. In this cross-sectional study, 36 participants (ages 19–78) were grouped as adults (ages 18–49) or seniors (ages 50+) according to the USA Pickleball age groupings. Participants completed a standard warm-up, one practice trial, and five full-effort trials with 4–6 min of rest between trials. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine reliability across five trials. Inter-rater reliability and validity of hand timing were also examined with ICCs. Pairwise comparison t -tests of individual trials were performed using the Hochberg method to determine learning effect. Linear regression analyses were used to determine if any segment could predict total trial time. During participation, older players provided unsolicited feedback that they were concerned about the safety of the backpedaling in the spider test. We observed that one person fell while backpedaling, though suffered no injury. Results indicate that the spider test was reliable across all five trials (ICC = 0.977). A learning effect was detected between the first and second trial ( p = 0.001), and the magnitude of the effect was significantly different between age groups ( p = 0.009). Hand timing demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.993) and validity (ICC = 0.990). Splits 2, 3, and 4 significantly predicted total test time (R 2 = 0.973, 0.973, and 0.986, respectively). The test demonstrated reliability, but older players expressed concern about backpedaling. This raises questions about backpedaling safety in pickleball. Therefore, we do not recommend this test. Future research needs to determine appropriate tests to screen for fall risk in the dynamic movements relevant to pickleball.

Suggested Citation

  • Margaret J. Falknor & Eric A. Martin & Steven B. Kim, 2025. "Spider Test Modified for Pickleball: Reliable, but Do Not Use It," J, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjopen:v:9:y:2025:i:1:p:1-:d:1825346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8800/9/1/1/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8800/9/1/1/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjopen:v:9:y:2025:i:1:p:1-:d:1825346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.