Sustainability Reporting Between Financial Market Forces and Regulatory Mandates: A Global Bibliometric Analysis

This study examines the evolution of sustainability reporting research by integrating financial market dynamics, regulatory frameworks, and digital transformation into a unified analytical lens. It explores how these forces shape the credibility, comparability, and strategic relevance of sustainability disclosure. A bibliometric analysis of 683 publications indexed in the Web of Science (2006–2025) was conducted. Performance indicators and science-mapping techniques were applied to identify the intellectual structure of the field. Four major thematic clusters were detected: (i) corporate social responsibility and disclosure performance, (ii) governance and accountability, (iii) regulatory and institutional frameworks, and (iv) financial market and digital innovation drivers. Findings reveal that Disclosure, corporate social responsibility, and performance remain the field’s core anchors, while governance, accountability, innovation, and strategy increasingly shape reporting credibility. Sustainability reporting reduces information asymmetry, lowers financing costs, and builds stakeholder trust; however, persistent fragmentation, greenwashing, and weak assurance highlight the need for global harmonization. Regulatory initiatives and market instruments are converging to institutionalize sustainability disclosure. The study advances a policy and managerial agenda advocating stronger governance oversight, harmonized disclosure frameworks, and technology-enabled assurance mechanisms to enhance transparency, accountability, and investor confidence.