Author
Listed:
- Sergio Da Silva
(Department of Economics, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis 88049-970, SC, Brazil)
- Ana Luize Bertoncini
(Department of Public Administration, Santa Catarina State University, Florianopolis 88035-001, SC, Brazil)
- Marianne Zwilling Stampe
(Department of Economics, Santa Catarina State University, Florianopolis 88035-001, SC, Brazil)
- Raul Matsushita
(Department of Statistics, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, DF, Brazil)
Abstract
This paper asks whether debt among affluent consumers reflects rational leverage, comparable to firms, or the influence of cognitive biases. Using survey data on Brazilian bank clients, we combine logistic regressions with a finite-mixture-inspired, rule-based classification and a test based on a ten-business-day overdraft grace period to identify heterogeneity in borrowing behavior. In the high-income subsample, Cognitive Reflection Test scores are unrelated to debt incidence, diverging from prior evidence in mixed-income populations. Among indebted affluent respondents, most borrowing is cost-sensitive and consistent with deliberate leverage (about 80 percent), while a minority displays patterns consistent with optimism bias and overconfidence (about 20 percent). The institutional feature of a temporary grace period lowers the effective cost of short-term credit and is associated with a marked reduction in overdraft use, reinforcing the leverage interpretation. Overall, consumer debt is heterogeneous; for the affluent, it largely aligns with leverage, though behavioral biases persist at the margins. Policy for high-income borrowers should prioritize targeted measures that address optimism bias and overconfidence while preserving deliberate leverage management through clear disclosures and monitoring of sensitivity to short-term credit costs.
Suggested Citation
Sergio Da Silva & Ana Luize Bertoncini & Marianne Zwilling Stampe & Raul Matsushita, 2025.
"Leverage or Bias? The Debt Behavior of High-Income Consumers,"
IJFS, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:238-:d:1815383
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:238-:d:1815383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.