IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v13y2025i3p167-d1742114.html

Predictive Power of ESG Factors for DAX ESG 50 Index Forecasting Using Multivariate LSTM

Author

Listed:
  • Manuel Rosinus

    (Department of Finance, Faculty of Economic Studies, University of Finance and Administration, 101 00 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Jan Lansky

    (Department of Computer Science and Mathematics, Faculty of Economic Studies, University of Finance and Administration, 101 00 Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

As investors increasingly use Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria, a key challenge remains: ESG data is typically reported annually, while financial markets move much faster. This study investigates whether incorporating annual ESG scores can improve monthly stock return forecasts for German DAX-listed firms. We employ a multivariate long short-term memory (LSTM) network, a machine learning model ideal for time series data, to test this hypothesis over two periods: an 8-year analysis with a full set of ESG scores and a 16-year analysis with a single disclosure score. The evaluation of model performance utilizes standard error metrics and directional accuracy, while statistical significance is assessed through paired statistical tests and the Diebold–Mariano test. Furthermore, we employ SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to ensure model explainability. We observe no statistically significant indication that incorporating annual ESG data enhances forecast accuracy. The 8-year study indicates that using a comprehensive ESG feature set results in a statistically significant increase in forecast error (RMSE and MAE) compared to a baseline model that utilizes solely historical returns. The ESG-enhanced model demonstrates no significant performance disparity compared to the baseline across the 16-year investigation. Our findings indicate that within the one-month-ahead projection horizon, the informative value of low-frequency ESG data is either fully incorporated into the market or is concealed by the significant forecasting capability of the historical return series. This study’s primary contribution is to demonstrate, through out-of-sample testing, that standard annual ESG information holds little practical value for generating predictive alpha, urging investors to seek more timely, alternative data sources.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuel Rosinus & Jan Lansky, 2025. "Predictive Power of ESG Factors for DAX ESG 50 Index Forecasting Using Multivariate LSTM," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:167-:d:1742114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/3/167/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/3/167/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feng, Jingwen & Goodell, John W. & Shen, Dehua, 2022. "ESG rating and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PB).
    2. Dahbi, F. & Carrasco, I. & Petracci, B., 2024. "A systematic literature review on social impact bonds," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).
    3. Samuel M. Hartzmark & Abigail B. Sussman, 2019. "Do Investors Value Sustainability? A Natural Experiment Examining Ranking and Fund Flows," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 74(6), pages 2789-2837, December.
    4. Rajna Gibson Brandon & Philipp Krueger & Peter Steffen Schmidt, 2021. "ESG Rating Disagreement and Stock Returns," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(4), pages 104-127, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Minghua Dong & Miaomiao Li & Hongxia Wang & Yuanyuan Pang, 2025. "ESG Disagreement and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from China," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 32(1), pages 267-299, March.
    2. Muck, Matthias & Schmidl, Thomas, 2024. "Comparing ESG score weighting approaches and stock performance differentiation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PB).
    3. Nakagawa, Kei & Morita, Keisuke & Sakemoto, Ryuta, 2025. "Stochastic ESG scores and nonpecuniary ESG preferences: An extension to CAPM," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    4. Alves, Rómulo & Krüger, Philipp & van Dijk, Mathijs, 2025. "Drawing up the bill: Are ESG ratings related to stock returns around the world?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    5. Tristan Jourde & Arthur Stalla-Bourdillon, 2026. "Environmental preferences and sector valuations," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 162(1), pages 45-85, February.
    6. Guo, Chun & Luo, Jingbo, 2026. "Green supply chain management and ESG rating divergence: A quasi-natural experiment in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    7. Zeng, Yongliang & Zhao, Xiangfang & Zhu, Yiwen, 2023. "Equity incentives and ESG performance: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PC).
    8. Rekha Pillai & Md. Aminul Islam & S. Sreejith & Husam Aldin Al-Malkawi, 2025. "Comparative analysis of environmental, social and governance (ESG) ratings: do sectors and regions differ?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 29(1), pages 69-109, March.
    9. Liu, Xiangqiang & Peng, Yuling & Li, Qinyang & Wu, Chu-Hua, 2025. "CEO pay structure and ESG rating disagreement," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    10. Horn, Matthias & Oehler, Andreas, 2024. "Constructing stock portfolios by sorting on ESG ratings: Does the rating provider matter?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    11. Cheng, Louis T.W. & Cheong, Tsun Se & Wojewodzki, Michal & Chui, David, 2025. "The effect of ESG divergence on the financial performance of Hong Kong-listed firms: An artificial neural network approach," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(PA).
    12. Ju, Chunhua & Fang, Xusheng & Shen, Zhonghua, 2025. "ESG rating divergence and stock price crash risk," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    13. Chang, Shun-Fen & Chen, Bai-Sian & Chen, Hong-Yi & Chen, Hsiao-Yin, 2025. "The impact of ESG ratings on firm risks in Taiwan's market," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    14. Yin, Libo & Zhu, Xiaoye & Su, Zhi & Guo, Hongliang, 2025. "Is disagreement beneficial for market efficiency? Evidence from ESG ratings," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    15. Galema, Rients & Gerritsen, Dirk, 2025. "ESG rating changes and stock returns," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    16. Lu, Xiaomeng & Zhang, Xianjun & Guo, Fusen & Li, Feng, 2024. "Evaluating ESG Investment Profitability: From the Perspective of Sophistication in Investment Decision-Making," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(PA).
    17. repec:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:10:p:228-250 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Mayank Joshipura & Sachin Mathur & Nikita Kedia, 2024. "Sustainable investing and financing for sustainable development: A hybrid review," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 4469-4485, October.
    19. Rabab Abouarab & Tapas Mishra & Simon Wolfe, 2025. "Spotting Portfolio Greenwashing in Environmental Funds," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 197(4), pages 811-839, April.
    20. Danni Yu & Tiantian Meng & Minyu Zheng & Rongyi Ma, 2024. "ESG uncertainty, investor attention and stock price crash risk in China: evidence from PVAR model analysis," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    21. Wang, Xue & Liu, Qingyuan, 2024. "Information disclosure and ESG rating disagreement: Evidence from green bond issuance in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:167-:d:1742114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.