IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v8y2011i5p1547-1559d12380.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Two Nicotine Replacement Treatment Delivery Models for a Tobacco Quitline

Author

Listed:
  • Jessie E. Saul

    (North American Research & Analysis, Inc., 1016 11th Ave. NE, Faribault, MN 55021, USA)

  • Rebecca Lien

    (Professional Data Analysts, Inc., Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA)

  • Barbara Schillo

    (ClearWay MinnesotaSM, Minneapolis, MN 55425, USA)

  • Annette Kavanaugh

    (Professional Data Analysts, Inc., Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA
    Indicates institutional affiliation at the time of data collection and analysis.)

  • Ann Wendling

    (ClearWay MinnesotaSM, Minneapolis, MN 55425, USA
    Indicates institutional affiliation at the time of data collection and analysis.)

  • Michael Luxenberg

    (Professional Data Analysts, Inc., Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA)

  • Lija Greenseid

    (Professional Data Analysts, Inc., Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA)

  • Lawrence C. An

    (General Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA)

Abstract

Many tobacco cessation quitlines provide nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in the U.S. but consensus is lacking regarding the best shipping protocol or NRT amounts. We evaluated the impact of the Minnesota QUITPLAN ® Helpline’s shift from distributing NRT using a single eight-week shipment to a two-shipment protocol. For this observational study, the eight week single-shipment cohort (n = 247) received eight weeks of NRT (patches or gum) at once, while the split-shipment cohort (n = 160) received five weeks of NRT (n = 94), followed by an additional three weeks of NRT if callers continued with counseling (n = 66). Patient satisfaction, retention, quit rates, and cost associated with the three groups were compared. A higher proportion of those receiving eight weeks of NRT, whether in one or two shipments, reported that the helpline was “very helpful” (77.2% of the single-shipment group; 81.1% of the two-shipment group) than those receiving five weeks of NRT (57.8% of the one-shipment group) (p = 0.004). Callers in the eight week two-shipment group completed significantly more calls (3.0) than callers in the five week one-shipment group (2.4) or eight week single-shipment group (1.7) (p vs. $326) due to the savings associated with not sending a second shipment to some participants. Assuming no difference in abstinence rates resulting from the protocol change, cost-per-quit was lowest for the five week one-shipment group ($1,155), and lower for the combined split-shipment cohort ($1,242) than for the single-shipment cohort ($1,350). Results of this evaluation indicate that while satisfaction rates increase among those receiving more counseling and NRT, quit rates do not, even when controlling for demographic and tobacco use characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessie E. Saul & Rebecca Lien & Barbara Schillo & Annette Kavanaugh & Ann Wendling & Michael Luxenberg & Lija Greenseid & Lawrence C. An, 2011. "Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Two Nicotine Replacement Treatment Delivery Models for a Tobacco Quitline," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:8:y:2011:i:5:p:1547-1559:d:12380
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/8/5/1547/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/8/5/1547/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:8:y:2011:i:5:p:1547-1559:d:12380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.