IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v7y2010i11p3954-3971d10157.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Municipalities Collaborating in Public Health: The Danish Smoking Prevention and Cessation Partnership

Author

Listed:
  • Pernille Tanggaard Andersen

    (Unit for Health Promotion Research, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Niels Bohrs Vej 9-10, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark)

  • Walid El Ansari

    (Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of Gloucestershire, Oxstalls Campus, Oxstalls Lane, Gloucester GL2 9HW, UK)

  • Hanna Barbara Rasmussen

    (Centre of Maritime Health and Safety, University of Southern Denmark, Niels Bohrs Vej 9-10, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark)

  • Christiane Stock

    (Unit for Health Promotion Research, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Niels Bohrs Vej 9-10, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark)

Abstract

This study explored the Smoking Prevention and Cessation Partnership (SPCP) which builds upon a collaboration between two Danish municipalities targeted at the prevention of tobacco smoking. The aim of the study was to describe the processes of SPCP, to examine the difficulties this collaboration faced, and to assess how these experiences could be used to improve future partnership collaboration. We employed qualitative methodology comprising 12 semi-structured one-to-one interviews with SPCP’s stakeholders and an analysis of the partnership documents and reports. The findings suggested that the main potentials of the partnership were the personal relations between the members and stakeholders with the possibilities of the creation of new connections with other actors. Barriers to successful partnership building were the implementation of the new Local Government Reform as a competing task, and that the two municipalities were heterogenic in respect to organizational issues and working methods. Other impediments included the lack of continuity in leadership, the lack of clarity regarding the form of collaboration and roles, as well as different expectations of the stakeholders. We conclude that four factors remain critical for partnerships. The first is the clarity of the collaborative effort. Second, partnerships need to take into account the structural circumstances and culture/value systems of all stakeholders. Third is the impact of contextual factors on the development of the partnership; and the fourth factor is the bearing of personal/individual factors on the partnership e.g., personal engagement in the project. Early attention to these four factors could contribute to more effective partnership working.

Suggested Citation

  • Pernille Tanggaard Andersen & Walid El Ansari & Hanna Barbara Rasmussen & Christiane Stock, 2010. "Municipalities Collaborating in Public Health: The Danish Smoking Prevention and Cessation Partnership," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-18, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:7:y:2010:i:11:p:3954-3971:d:10157
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/7/11/3954/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/7/11/3954/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walid El Ansari & Reza Oskrochi & Ceri Phillips, 2009. "Engagement and Action for Health: The Contribution of Leaders’ Collaborative Skills to Partnership Success," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:7:y:2010:i:11:p:3954-3971:d:10157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.