IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v2y2005i3p469-477d2764.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Organic Loading on Rotating Biological Contactor Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Kossay K. Al-Ahmady

    (University of Mosul, College of Engineering, Civil Engineering Dept., Mosul, Iraq)

Abstract

Organic loading (weight per unit time per volume) is useful for the design of rotating biological contactors (RBC) and for comparison with the other processes such as activated sludge or oxidation ponds. The present study puts emphasis on the significance of this control or design parameter because it allows direct comparison of the RBC system's performance when operated under various circumstances and with different kinds of wastewater. The results of the paper proved that, the COD removal in rotating biological contactor systems is a function of the organic loading rate. However, each of the wastewater concentration and flow rate are also influence on the system efficiency but theirs impact can be combined by the effect of organic loading. The majority of COD removal (40-85 % of the total removal depending on the organic loading applied) occurs in the first stages of the system. There is a strong correlation between the organic loading and the concentration of the suspended solids in the rotating biological contactor basin. At higher loadings higher concentrations noted. At a loading of about, (24 g/m 2 .d) suspended solids were 225, 125, 35, and 25 mg/L in the first, second, third and, the fourth stage respectively. To achieve an effluent quality of (BOD 2 .d and 65 gCOD/m 2 .d) respectively. For nitrification process, the system must be designed to operate at organic loading of about (10 g/m 2 .d) or less and, the reactor or basin volume should be designed to achieve a hydraulic loading of about (40 L/m 2 .d) or less.

Suggested Citation

  • Kossay K. Al-Ahmady, 2005. "Effect of Organic Loading on Rotating Biological Contactor Efficiency," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-9, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:2:y:2005:i:3:p:469-477:d:2764
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/2/3/469/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/2/3/469/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    n/a;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:2:y:2005:i:3:p:469-477:d:2764. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.