IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v23y2026i8p981-d2002174.html

Structural and Organizational Dimensions of Compassion Fatigue in Pediatric Oncology Nursing: A Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Teresa Galanti

    (Department of Psychology, “G. d’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy)

  • Morena Santoriello

    (Department of Psychology, “G. d’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy)

  • Michela Cortini

    (Department of Psychology, “G. d’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy)

  • Elisa Di Tullio

    (ASL Pescara, 65125 Pescara, Italy)

  • Angelica Di Febbo

    (School of Medicine and Health Sciences, “G. d’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy)

  • Stefania Fantinelli

    (Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, Center for Research in Applied Psychology, eCampus University, 00182 Rome, Italy)

  • Gabriella Mincione

    (Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine & Dentistry, “G. d’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy)

Abstract

Pediatric oncology nursing is among the highest-intensity care specialties, exposing nurses to repeated child death and sustained emotional investment in family relationships. This occupational burden is a recognized psychosocial risk factor and a driver of compassion fatigue, burnout, and reported intention to leave, yet the organizational and educational determinants of this risk remain poorly captured by existing assessment approaches. This study investigated the lived experiences of nurses caring for terminally ill children in a pediatric onco-hematology unit and hospice ward in central Italy (N = 15), using a qualitative descriptive design, informed by a phenomenological sensibility to lived experience, supported by computer-assisted textual analysis. Structured face-to-face interviews were analyzed through thematic content analysis with stepwise replication, while quantitative textual analysis was performed using T-Lab software to map co-occurrence patterns among key lemmas, providing a frequency-based, semantically grounded picture of nurses’ representations of occupational risk. Seven themes emerged, including quality of nursing care, parental relationships, coping with a child’s death, and impact on personal and professional life. Findings showed that reported intention to leave was associated, in participants’ accounts, with absent psychological debriefing, cumulative emotional burden, inadequate end-of-life training, and a near-total absence of organizational vocabulary for peer-level support—a gap directly visible in the co-occurrence structure of nurses’ language. As a secondary aim, by combining qualitative depth with complementary lexical analysis of thematic patterns, this study also offers a methodological example of how psychosocial risk in high-intensity care settings can be assessed and translated into actionable indicators for organizational climate and workforce well-being. The findings inform concrete prevention strategies and policy recommendations for nursing education and occupational health, consistent with this Special Issue’s focus on methodological innovation for psychosocial risk assessment and public health policy design.

Suggested Citation

  • Teresa Galanti & Morena Santoriello & Michela Cortini & Elisa Di Tullio & Angelica Di Febbo & Stefania Fantinelli & Gabriella Mincione, 2026. "Structural and Organizational Dimensions of Compassion Fatigue in Pediatric Oncology Nursing: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 23(8), pages 1-24, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:23:y:2026:i:8:p:981-:d:2002174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/23/8/981/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/23/8/981/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:23:y:2026:i:8:p:981-:d:2002174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.