IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v23y2026i8p966-d2000343.html

Motorcycle Noise Annoyance in Residential Areas Along Popular Leisure Routes

Author

Listed:
  • Dirk Schreckenberg

    (ZEUS GmbH, Centre for Applied Psychology, Environmental and Social Research, D-58093 Hagen, Germany)

  • Sarah Leona Benz

    (ZEUS GmbH, Centre for Applied Psychology, Environmental and Social Research, D-58093 Hagen, Germany)

  • Julia Kuhlmann

    (ZEUS GmbH, Centre for Applied Psychology, Environmental and Social Research, D-58093 Hagen, Germany)

  • Jonas Bilik

    (ZEUS GmbH, Centre for Applied Psychology, Environmental and Social Research, D-58093 Hagen, Germany)

  • Christian Popp

    (Lärmkontor GmbH, D-22761 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Frank Heidebrunn

    (Lärmkontor GmbH, D-22761 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Wolfgang Wack

    (ZEUS GmbH, Centre for Applied Psychology, Environmental and Social Research, D-58093 Hagen, Germany)

  • Ferenc Marki

    (Department of Networked Systems and Services, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract

Motorcycle noise along leisure routes constitutes a distinct environmental health burden poorly captured by standard road traffic noise indicators. This study derives source-specific exposure–response functions and examines non-acoustic predictors of residential motorcycle noise annoyance. A mixed-methods socio-acoustic design was applied in five study areas in Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany. A community survey ( N = 493) assessed long-term annoyance (12-month recall); a smartphone-based experience-sampling study (MotoApp; N = 213; ten days in summer 2022) collected hourly ratings. Acoustic measurements provided vehicle-specific L Aeq,1h , L AFmax,1h , and N 60 ; exposure–response functions were estimated using logistic regression and generalised estimating equations. In the long-term survey, 46.5% were highly annoyed by motorcycle noise, compared with 18.4% for passenger cars. Motorcycle exposure–response curves were markedly shifted; the 25–highly-annoyed threshold was reached approximately 16 dB lower in L Aeq,1h than for passenger cars on weekends. Negative attitudes towards motorcycle riders, low coping capacity, and noise sensitivity were significant independent predictors. Source-specific assessment is necessary for motorcycle leisure routes. The 25–highly-annoyed criterion maps to approximately 52 dB L Aeq,1h and 78 dB L AFmax,1h on weekends, and to 25 N 60 events per hour—substantially below current road traffic guideline values—providing actionable thresholds for noise action planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Dirk Schreckenberg & Sarah Leona Benz & Julia Kuhlmann & Jonas Bilik & Christian Popp & Frank Heidebrunn & Wolfgang Wack & Ferenc Marki, 2026. "Motorcycle Noise Annoyance in Residential Areas Along Popular Leisure Routes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 23(8), pages 1-29, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:23:y:2026:i:8:p:966-:d:2000343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/23/8/966/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/23/8/966/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:23:y:2026:i:8:p:966-:d:2000343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.