IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v23y2026i8p944-d1997997.html

Beyond Technological Access: Exploring Contextual Factors Related to Teleassessment Usability in Interstitial Lung Disease

Author

Listed:
  • Wallace Pereira Silva

    (Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), São Paulo 01504-001, SP, Brazil)

  • Giovanna Camargo Mello

    (Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), São Paulo 01504-001, SP, Brazil)

  • Deborah Madeu Pereira

    (Department of Pneumology, Santa Casa de Misericórdia Hospital, São Paulo 01221-020, SP, Brazil)

  • Cid André Fidelis De Paula Gomes

    (Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), São Paulo 01504-001, SP, Brazil)

  • Carla Malaguti

    (Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences and Physical-Functional Performance, Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Juiz de For a 36036-900, MG, Brazil)

  • Luciana Maria Malosa Sampaio

    (Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), São Paulo 01504-001, SP, Brazil)

  • Soraia Micaela Silva

    (Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), São Paulo 01504-001, SP, Brazil)

Abstract

Telehealth has the potential to improve access to healthcare, but teleassessment usability may be influenced by contextual factors beyond technology access alone. This study investigated factors associated with teleassessment usability among individuals with interstitial lung disease (ILD) in Brazil using a convergent mixed methods design with 31 adults from four Brazilian regions. Usability was assessed with the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ-Brazil); associations with contextual variables were examined using Spearman’s correlation. Qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis. Participants generally reported acceptable usability perceptions with predominance of agreement responses; greater dispersion was observed for items related to equivalence with in-person care and video quality. Usability was significantly associated with income (rho = 0.437; p = 0.014), perceived clinical feasibility (rho = −0.397; p = 0.027), and perceived intensity of access barriers (rho = −0.428; p = 0.016). Qualitative findings identified financial constraints, digital literacy, internet stability, third-party support dependence, and absence of physical examination as key experiential factors. Teleassessment was perceived as a complement for follow-up and triage rather than a substitute for face-to-face assessment. Usability in ILD is shaped by socioeconomic, clinical, and structural factors, underscoring the need to address digital inequalities in telehealth implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Wallace Pereira Silva & Giovanna Camargo Mello & Deborah Madeu Pereira & Cid André Fidelis De Paula Gomes & Carla Malaguti & Luciana Maria Malosa Sampaio & Soraia Micaela Silva, 2026. "Beyond Technological Access: Exploring Contextual Factors Related to Teleassessment Usability in Interstitial Lung Disease," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 23(8), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:23:y:2026:i:8:p:944-:d:1997997
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/23/8/944/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/23/8/944/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:23:y:2026:i:8:p:944-:d:1997997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.