IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v23y2026i6p805-d1969010.html

Occupational Exposure Profiles and Respiratory Health Outcomes Among Surface and Underground Miners: A Comparative Epidemiological Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Masilu Daniel Masekameni

    (Development Studies, School of Social Sciences, University of South Africa, Pretoria 0003, South Africa)

  • Thokozane Patrick Mbonane

    (Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Doornfontein Campus, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2094, South Africa)

  • Khathutshelo Vincent Mphaga

    (Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Doornfontein Campus, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2094, South Africa)

  • Themba Titus Sigudu

    (Division of Health and Society, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2094, South Africa)

  • Phoka Caiphus Rathebe

    (Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Doornfontein Campus, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2094, South Africa)

Abstract

Occupational lung diseases remain a significant public health concern in mining populations, particularly in high-exposure environments. This study examined occupational exposure profiles and respiratory health outcomes among surface and underground miners in Mpumalanga Province. A cross-sectional analytical design was employed among 239 mine workers. Data on socio-demographic characteristics, occupational exposures, behavioural factors, and respiratory outcomes were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression models. Underground miners were significantly more likely to report high dust exposure (44.9% vs. 24.1%), poor ventilation (60.6% vs. 39.3%), and longer working hours (>8 h: 68.5% vs. 50.0%) compared to surface miners. They also reported a higher prevalence of respiratory symptoms, including chronic cough (45.7% vs. 25.9%), shortness of breath (41.7% vs. 23.2%), wheezing (34.6% vs. 18.8%), and diagnosed lung disease (23.6% vs. 9.8%). Multivariable analysis showed that underground mining (AOR = 1.92; 95% CI: 1.08–3.41), smoking (AOR = 1.78; 95% CI: 1.02–3.11), and high dust exposure (AOR = 2.89; 95% CI: 1.45–5.76) were independent predictors of chronic cough. A significant interaction between smoking and underground mining (AOR = 2.74; 95% CI: 1.32–5.68) further amplified respiratory risk. Additionally, underground miners demonstrated lower levels of knowledge (48.8% vs. 66.1%) and poorer preventive practices (44.1% vs. 64.3%). These findings highlight the combined influence of occupational and behavioural factors on respiratory health and highlight the need for integrated interventions to reduce the burden of occupational lung diseases.

Suggested Citation

  • Masilu Daniel Masekameni & Thokozane Patrick Mbonane & Khathutshelo Vincent Mphaga & Themba Titus Sigudu & Phoka Caiphus Rathebe, 2026. "Occupational Exposure Profiles and Respiratory Health Outcomes Among Surface and Underground Miners: A Comparative Epidemiological Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 23(6), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:23:y:2026:i:6:p:805-:d:1969010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/23/6/805/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/23/6/805/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:23:y:2026:i:6:p:805-:d:1969010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.