IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v23y2026i4p534-d1924167.html

Out of Sight: Sex Differences in Public and Semi-Public Drug Use Settings Among People Who Use Opioids in Baltimore, Maryland

Author

Listed:
  • Carl A. Latkin

    (Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
    Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA)

  • Lauren Dayton

    (Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA)

  • Ananya Bhaktaram

    (Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA)

  • Melissa A. Davey-Rothwell

    (Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA)

  • Haley Bonneau

    (Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA)

  • Grace Tian Yi

    (Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA)

  • Oluwaseun Falade-Nwulia

    (Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA)

Abstract

Background: Drug use settings are critical determinants of overdose risk and other drug-related harms. Although sex differences in drug use patterns are well documented, less is known about sex differences in the types of locations where people use drugs. This study examined sex differences in drug use settings among people who use opioids. Methods: Data were from the baseline survey of the OASIS project, a community-based study conducted in Baltimore, Maryland (N = 869), focusing on 9 specific types of locations where participants reported drug use in the past 30 days: their own residence, someone else’s residence, street, alley, park, abandoned building, public restroom, car, and other locations. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression models examined associations between sex and drug use settings, adjusting for age, race, education, homelessness, and frequency of drug use. Results: The sample included 346 women and 523 men. In adjusted models, women had significantly lower odds than men of using drugs on the street (aOR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.35–0.70), in alleys (aOR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.35–0.69), parks (aOR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.42–0.78), abandoned buildings (aOR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.38–0.75), cars (aOR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.41–0.73), and other locations (aOR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.37–0.94). Sex was not significantly associated with drug use at one’s own residence or someone else’s residence. Conclusions: Women who use opioids were significantly less likely than men to use drugs in public and semi-public settings, which may reflect gendered patterns of stigma, interpersonal violence, and safety concerns. Harm reduction programs should focus on making current drug use settings safer and developing additional safer settings with an emphasis on addressing barriers for women to access harm reduction services, including women-centered overdose prevention centers and household-based overdose response training.

Suggested Citation

  • Carl A. Latkin & Lauren Dayton & Ananya Bhaktaram & Melissa A. Davey-Rothwell & Haley Bonneau & Grace Tian Yi & Oluwaseun Falade-Nwulia, 2026. "Out of Sight: Sex Differences in Public and Semi-Public Drug Use Settings Among People Who Use Opioids in Baltimore, Maryland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 23(4), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:23:y:2026:i:4:p:534-:d:1924167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/23/4/534/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/23/4/534/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:23:y:2026:i:4:p:534-:d:1924167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.