Author
Listed:
- Yerden Khaumet
(Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Clinical and Diagnostic Center, Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh-Turkish University, Turkestan 161200, Kazakhstan)
- Almasbek Akhmetov
(Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Clinical and Diagnostic Center, Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh-Turkish University, Turkestan 161200, Kazakhstan)
- Ikilas Moldaliyev
(Faculty of Medicine, Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh-Turkish University, Turkestan 161200, Kazakhstan)
- Azamat Seksenbayev
(Independent Researcher, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan)
- Ainash Oshibayeva
(Faculty of Medicine, Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh-Turkish University, Turkestan 161200, Kazakhstan)
- Saltanat Kyrykbayeva
(Faculty of Medicine, Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh-Turkish University, Turkestan 161200, Kazakhstan)
- Gulnaz Nuskabayeva
(Faculty of Medicine, Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh-Turkish University, Turkestan 161200, Kazakhstan)
- Akylbek Ibragim
(Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Clinical and Diagnostic Center, Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh-Turkish University, Turkestan 161200, Kazakhstan)
Abstract
Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a prevalent condition associated with pain and reduced physical function worldwide, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) is one of the most commonly used disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures. Its use in non-English-speaking populations requires appropriate translation and validation, and no validated Kazakh version has previously been available. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Kazakh version of the WOMAC in patients with KOA. A cross-sectional validation study was conducted among 452 patients with clinically diagnosed KOA and 126 healthy individuals, following established international guidelines. The study assessed internal consistency, test–retest reliability, construct validity, content validity, convergent validity, known-groups validity, and floor and ceiling effects. The Kazakh WOMAC demonstrated acceptable to high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.77–0.88) and good test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.78–0.83). Content validity was excellent (S-CVI/Ave = 0.96), and confirmatory factor analysis supported the original three-factor structure. Expected correlations with SF-36 domains confirmed convergent validity, and WOMAC scores differentiated patients with KOA from healthy individuals, with no relevant floor or ceiling effects observed. The Kazakh version of the WOMAC is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing pain, stiffness, and physical function in Kazakh-speaking patients with KOA.
Suggested Citation
Yerden Khaumet & Almasbek Akhmetov & Ikilas Moldaliyev & Azamat Seksenbayev & Ainash Oshibayeva & Saltanat Kyrykbayeva & Gulnaz Nuskabayeva & Akylbek Ibragim, 2026.
"Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Kazakh Version of the WOMAC Index in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 23(4), pages 1-11, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:23:y:2026:i:4:p:445-:d:1910679
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:23:y:2026:i:4:p:445-:d:1910679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.