IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v23y2026i2p200-d1856537.html

Developing an Index to Measure Structural Racism: Methodological Process, Challenges, and Considerations

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher M. Amissah

    (Department of Practice, Sciences, and Health Outcomes Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
    Graduate Program in Psychometrics, Department of Psychology, Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD 21251, USA)

  • Alisha A. Crump

    (Department of Practice, Sciences, and Health Outcomes Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
    School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA)

  • Yu-Hua Fu

    (Department of Practice, Sciences, and Health Outcomes Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA)

  • Sheela Khadka

    (Department of Practice, Sciences, and Health Outcomes Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA)

  • Jennifer Contreras

    (Department of Practice, Sciences, and Health Outcomes Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA)

  • Salene M. W. Jones

    (Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research (HICOR), Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutch, Seattle, WA 98109, USA)

  • Bryce B. Reeve

    (Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA)

  • Ester Villalonga-Olives

    (Department of Practice, Sciences, and Health Outcomes Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA)

Abstract

Access to valid and reliable measures of structural racism is essential for addressing health inequities, yet few validated ecological-level indices exist for assessing structural racism affecting Black and Hispanic populations in the United States. Guided by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities framework, our interdisciplinary team undertook the development of an ecological-level structural racism index. In the process, we encountered substantive methodological and data-related challenges that warrant explicit documentation. This paper describes the methodological process used to identify and select indicators of structural racism, including a modified Delphi consensus process involving social epidemiologists, health inequality researchers, community members, economic inequality specialists, and psychometricians. We outline a five-step approach for extracting and harmonizing geographic-level data from publicly available sources and discuss key challenges encountered, including limited availability of granular geographic data, insufficient data documentation guidelines, inconsistent reporting frequencies, and difficulties in adapting publicly available datasets for structural racism measurement. Rather than presenting a finalized index, this paper serves as a methodological guide and cautionary account for researchers seeking to develop ecological measures of structural racism, emphasizing the importance of transparency, adaptability, and rigorous data selection in advancing public health equity research.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher M. Amissah & Alisha A. Crump & Yu-Hua Fu & Sheela Khadka & Jennifer Contreras & Salene M. W. Jones & Bryce B. Reeve & Ester Villalonga-Olives, 2026. "Developing an Index to Measure Structural Racism: Methodological Process, Challenges, and Considerations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 23(2), pages 1-17, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:23:y:2026:i:2:p:200-:d:1856537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/23/2/200/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/23/2/200/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:23:y:2026:i:2:p:200-:d:1856537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.