Author
Listed:
- Tetyana P. Shippee
(Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA)
- Romil R. Parikh
(Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA)
- Nicholas Musinguzi
(Division of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA)
- Benjamin W. Langworthy
(Division of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA)
- Jack M. Wolf
(Division of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA)
- Stephanie Giordano
(Human Services Research Institute, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA)
- Eric Jutkowitz
(Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA)
Abstract
Access to home- and community-based services (HCBS) is critical for aging in place; yet many older adults continue to experience unmet needs. While individual-level factors are better-studied, less is known about how neighborhood-level place-based factors (PBFs, e.g., poverty, housing conditions, transportation, and internet access) shape access to and adequacy of HCBS. This study addresses that gap by examining the added explanatory value of PBFs in predicting HCBS use and unmet needs. We analyzed data from 6558 community-dwelling adults aged ≥ 65 years using the 2022–2023 National Core Indicators–Aging & Disability Adult Consumer Survey. Outcomes included use of six HCBS types, consumer-reported unmet needs for each type, and overall unmet HCBS needs. PBFs were measured at the ZIP code level using the 2016–2020 American Community Survey. Nested logistic regression models estimated incremental variance (McFadden’s R 2 ) explained by PBFs, adjusting for individual demographics, health status, state, and proxy response. Adding PBFs increased explained variance by 7.98–22.70% for HCBS use, 35.92–48.00% for unmet needs by service type, and 51.85% for overall unmet HCBS needs. PBFs meaningfully influence both access to and adequacy of HCBS. Using PBFs to guide resource allocation and targeting modifiable PBFs could improve HCBS access and efficiency.
Suggested Citation
Tetyana P. Shippee & Romil R. Parikh & Nicholas Musinguzi & Benjamin W. Langworthy & Jack M. Wolf & Stephanie Giordano & Eric Jutkowitz, 2025.
"Associations of Place-Based Factors with Service Use and Consumer-Reported Unmet Service Needs Among Older Adults Using Publicly Funded Home- and Community-Based Services in the United States,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(9), pages 1-22, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:9:p:1461-:d:1754846
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:9:p:1461-:d:1754846. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.