IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i9p1456-d1753542.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Summary of Pain Locations and Neuropathic Patterns Extracted Automatically from Patient Self-Reported Sensation Drawings

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Bishara

    (Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
    Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA)

  • Elisabetta de Rinaldis

    (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
    Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Departmental Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Universitá Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy)

  • Trisha F. Hue

    (Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA)

  • Thomas Peterson

    (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA)

  • Jennifer Cummings

    (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA)

  • Abel Torres-Espin

    (Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
    School of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada)

  • Jeannie F. Bailey

    (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA)

  • Jeffrey C. Lotz

    (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA)

  • REACH Investigators

    (Membership of the REACH Investigators is provided in the Acknowledgments.)

Abstract

Background Chronic low-back pain (LBP) is the largest contributor to disability worldwide, yet many assessments still reduce a complex, spatially distributed condition to a single 0–10 score. Body-map drawings capture location and extent of pain, but manual digitization is too slow and inconsistent for large studies or real-time telehealth. Methods Paper pain drawings from 332 adults in the multicenter COMEBACK study (four University of California sites, March 2021–June 2023) were scanned to PDFs. A Python pipeline automatically (i) rasterized PDF pages with pdf2image v1.17.0; (ii) resized each scan and delineated anterior/posterior regions of interest; (iii) registered patient silhouettes to a canonical high-resolution template using ORB key-points, Brute-Force Hamming matching, RANSAC inlier selection, and 3 × 3 projective homography implemented in OpenCV; (iv) removed template outlines via adaptive Gaussian thresholding, Canny edge detection, and 3 × 3 dilation, leaving only patient-drawn strokes; (v) produced binary masks for pain, numbness, and pins-and-needles, then stacked these across subjects to create pixel-frequency matrices; and (vi) normalized matrices with min–max scaling and rendered heat maps. RGB composites assigned distinct channels to each sensation, enabling intuitive visualization of overlapping symptom distributions and for future data analyses. Results Cohort-level maps replicated classic low-back pain hotspots over lumbar paraspinals, gluteal fold, and posterior thighs, while exposing less-recognized clusters along the lateral hip and lower abdomen. Neuropathic-leaning drawings displayed broader leg involvement than purely nociceptive patterns. Conclusions Our automated workflow converts pen-on-paper pain drawings into machine-readable digitized images and heat maps at the population scale, laying practical groundwork for spatially informed, precision management of chronic LBP.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Bishara & Elisabetta de Rinaldis & Trisha F. Hue & Thomas Peterson & Jennifer Cummings & Abel Torres-Espin & Jeannie F. Bailey & Jeffrey C. Lotz & REACH Investigators, 2025. "A Summary of Pain Locations and Neuropathic Patterns Extracted Automatically from Patient Self-Reported Sensation Drawings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(9), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:9:p:1456-:d:1753542
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/9/1456/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/9/1456/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:9:p:1456-:d:1753542. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.