Author
Listed:
- Marcos Vinícius de Castro
(Graduate Program in Civil and Environmental Engineering, São Paulo State University, Eng. Luís Coube Avenue, 2085, Bauru City 17033-360, Brazil)
- Rogerio Galante Negri
(Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University, Presidente Dutra Highway, Km 137,8, São José dos Campos City 12247-004, Brazil)
- Fabiana Alves Fiore
(Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University, Presidente Dutra Highway, Km 137,8, São José dos Campos City 12247-004, Brazil)
- Adriano Bressane
(Graduate Program in Civil and Environmental Engineering, São Paulo State University, Eng. Luís Coube Avenue, 2085, Bauru City 17033-360, Brazil
Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University, Presidente Dutra Highway, Km 137,8, São José dos Campos City 12247-004, Brazil)
Abstract
Occupational environments often expose workers to physical and psychological stressors that compromise well-being and productivity. While biophilic design has gained attention, there remains limited systematic integration of Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) within workplace management frameworks. This review aims to map the empirical impacts of NbSs on occupational health, productivity, and environmental quality, and to identify key barriers and facilitators for their integration into comprehensive Quality, Environmental, Health, and Safety (QEHS) management systems. A scoping literature review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. A comprehensive search was performed in the Scopus and Web of Science databases for studies published between 2019 and 2024. A total of 2452 records were initially retrieved, with 39 studies retained for synthesis following screening, eligibility assessment, and critical appraisal using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Findings indicate that NbSs can reduce stress, improve physical and cognitive health, and enhance workplace productivity. Reported benefits include reduced absenteeism, improved indoor air quality, and measurable financial returns. However, significant challenges persist, including high upfront costs, ongoing maintenance demands, a shortage of specialized labor, and methodological heterogeneity across studies. In particular, hybrid approaches combining physical natural elements and immersive technologies such as virtual reality emerged as promising alternatives for spatially constrained environments. Participatory co-design and stakeholder engagement were also identified as critical success factors for effective implementation. Integrating NbSs into QEHS frameworks has the potential to foster healthier, more resilient, and sustainable workplaces. Alignment with recognized certifications can further support systematic adoption and monitoring. Future research should prioritize longitudinal designs, standardized outcome metrics, and physiological markers, while addressing geographical gaps through studies in underrepresented regions. Embedding participatory processes and certification alignment can enhance stakeholder buy-in and practical scalability, advancing the integration of NbSs into holistic workplace management strategies.
Suggested Citation
Marcos Vinícius de Castro & Rogerio Galante Negri & Fabiana Alves Fiore & Adriano Bressane, 2025.
"Nature-Based Solutions in Workplace Settings: A Scoping Review on Pathways for Integrated Quality, Environmental, Health, and Safety Management,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(9), pages 1-27, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:9:p:1455-:d:1753252
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:9:p:1455-:d:1753252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.