IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i9p1430-d1748820.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Health Technologies for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence, Access Inequities, and Public Health Integration

Author

Listed:
  • Tatiana Cristina Dias de Oliveira

    (Graduate Program in Family Health, Federal University of the South and Southeast of Pará, Maraba 68507-590, Brazil)

  • Alana Ferreira de Oliveira

    (Graduate Program in Family Health, Federal University of the South and Southeast of Pará, Maraba 68507-590, Brazil)

  • Laila de Castro Araújo

    (Graduate Program in Family Health, Federal University of the South and Southeast of Pará, Maraba 68507-590, Brazil)

  • Maria Pantoja Moreira de Sena

    (Postgraduate Program in Tropical Diseases, Federal University of Pará, Belem 66075-110, Brazil)

  • Valéria de Castro Fagundes

    (Faculty of Medical Sciences of Pará, Para 38405-320, Brazil)

  • Phelipe Augusto Rabelo Paixão

    (Graduate Program in Family Health, Federal University of the South and Southeast of Pará, Maraba 68507-590, Brazil)

  • Stefani Gisele Bastos Dornas

    (Graduate Program in Family Health, Federal University of the South and Southeast of Pará, Maraba 68507-590, Brazil)

  • Clarisse Andrade Sales

    (Postgraduate Program in Biodiversity and Biotechnology, Federal University of the South and Southeast of Pará, Maraba 68507-590, Brazil)

  • Ana Paula Simões Castro

    (Postgraduate Program in Biodiversity and Biotechnology, Federal University of the South and Southeast of Pará, Maraba 68507-590, Brazil)

  • Patricia Alves de Mendonça Cavalcante

    (Postgraduate Program in Biodiversity and Biotechnology, Federal University of the South and Southeast of Pará, Maraba 68507-590, Brazil)

  • Luann Wendel Pereira de Sena

    (Graduate Program in Family Health, Federal University of the South and Southeast of Pará, Maraba 68507-590, Brazil
    Postgraduate Program in Biodiversity and Biotechnology, Federal University of the South and Southeast of Pará, Maraba 68507-590, Brazil)

Abstract

Diabetic foot ulcers are among the most severe complications of diabetes mellitus, disproportionately affecting populations in low- and middle-income countries. Digital health technologies have emerged as promising tools for prevention, diagnosis, and management; however, their effectiveness, usability, and applicability within public health systems remain insufficiently defined. This systematic review aimed to critically synthesize the clinical effectiveness, perceived usability, and methodological quality of digital interventions for the care of individuals with diabetes-related foot ulcers. A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar for studies published between 2012 and 2024. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing mobile health applications, wearable sensor devices, artificial intelligence-based tools, and telehealth platforms. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Artificial intelligence-driven approaches demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy, with sensitivity and specificity above 90% for ulcer detection and classification. Mobile applications showed positive effects on self-efficacy, glycemic control, and adherence to preventive foot care, while usability scores were consistently high. Wearable sensor devices demonstrated potential for reducing ulcer recurrence, though supporting evidence remains limited. Across studies, recurrent methodological limitations included small sample sizes, absence of control groups, lack of economic evaluations, and barriers related to digital literacy and interoperability between systems. Most investigations were conducted in high-income countries, with limited consideration of public health contexts such as the Brazilian Unified Health System. In conclusion, digital health technologies show promise in improving the care of individuals with diabetes-related foot complications but face significant challenges regarding scalability, equity of access, and integration into public healthcare systems. Future research should prioritize context-adapted designs, robust clinical trials, and economic evaluations to inform health policies and support the rational adoption of these tools within universal health coverage frameworks. PROSPERO registration number: CRD420251023152.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatiana Cristina Dias de Oliveira & Alana Ferreira de Oliveira & Laila de Castro Araújo & Maria Pantoja Moreira de Sena & Valéria de Castro Fagundes & Phelipe Augusto Rabelo Paixão & Stefani Gisele Ba, 2025. "Digital Health Technologies for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence, Access Inequities, and Public Health Integration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(9), pages 1-18, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:9:p:1430-:d:1748820
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/9/1430/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/9/1430/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:9:p:1430-:d:1748820. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.