IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i9p1427-d1748552.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Burnout and Psychosocial Risks Among Doctors Working in the Private Sector: The Role of Health and Wellbeing Resources

Author

Listed:
  • Kevin Rui-Han Teoh

    (Birkbeck Business School, Birkbeck, University of London, London WC1E 7HX, UK)

  • Oliver Bullock

    (Affinity Health at Work, London SW12 9NW, UK)

  • Marleen Reinke

    (Birkbeck Business School, Birkbeck, University of London, London WC1E 7HX, UK
    Affinity Health at Work, London SW12 9NW, UK)

  • Gail Kinman

    (Birkbeck Business School, Birkbeck, University of London, London WC1E 7HX, UK)

  • Nicola Cordell

    (Cordell Health, Portsmouth PO6 3TH, UK)

  • Jo Yarker

    (Birkbeck Business School, Birkbeck, University of London, London WC1E 7HX, UK
    Affinity Health at Work, London SW12 9NW, UK)

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of private-sector work among doctors raises questions about its impact on their health and wellbeing. While private practice may offer autonomy and financial benefits, it presents unique psychosocial risks that are less understood. This study investigates the relationship between private-sector work, psychosocial working conditions, and burnout among doctors, and examines whether access to health and wellbeing resources changes these relationships. A cross-sectional survey with 509 doctors from 16 countries working either exclusively or partially in private practice assessed psychosocial risk factors (e.g., work demands, financial pressures, support, job control), and burnout, alongside access to and use of wellbeing resources. Results showed that more time in private practice was associated with higher work and financial demands, bullying, and burnout. Although access to health and wellbeing resources was initially linked to lower burnout, this relationship was not significant when psychosocial risk factors were accounted for. These findings suggest that support mechanisms are often reactive and insufficient in mitigating the impact of systemic demands. The study highlights the need for private healthcare employers to recognise their role in developing healthy work environments, and for organisational-level interventions to address the root causes of poor health and wellbeing among doctors in this sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Kevin Rui-Han Teoh & Oliver Bullock & Marleen Reinke & Gail Kinman & Nicola Cordell & Jo Yarker, 2025. "Burnout and Psychosocial Risks Among Doctors Working in the Private Sector: The Role of Health and Wellbeing Resources," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(9), pages 1-13, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:9:p:1427-:d:1748552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/9/1427/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/9/1427/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hanne Berthelsen & Hugo Westerlund & Gunnar Bergström & Hermann Burr, 2020. "Validation of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire Version III and Establishment of Benchmarks for Psychosocial Risk Management in Sweden," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-22, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katarina Wijk & Eva L. Bergsten & David M. Hallman, 2020. "Sense of Coherence, Health, Well-Being, and Work Satisfaction before and after Implementing Activity-Based Workplaces," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Joana Duarte & Hanne Berthelsen & Mikaela Owen, 2020. "Not All Emotional Demands Are the Same: Emotional Demands from Clients’ or Co-Workers’ Relations Have Different Associations with Well-Being in Service Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Teresa P. Cotrim & Pedro Bem-Haja & Anabela Pereira & Cláudia Fernandes & Rui Azevedo & Samuel Antunes & Joaquim S. Pinto & Flávio Kanazawa & Isabel Souto & Elisabeth Brito & Carlos F. Silva, 2022. "The Portuguese Third Version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire: Preliminary Validation Studies of the Middle Version among Municipal and Healthcare Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-14, January.
    4. Andrea Eriksson & Lotta Dellve & Anna Williamsson & Katrin Skagert, 2022. "How Conditions and Resources Connected to Digital Management Systems and Remote Work Are Associated with Sustainable Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-11, November.
    5. Hanne Berthelsen & Tuija Muhonen & Gunnar Bergström & Hugo Westerlund & Maureen F. Dollard, 2020. "Benchmarks for Evidence-Based Risk Assessment with the Swedish Version of the 4-Item Psychosocial Safety Climate Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Anabela Pereira & Elisabeth Brito & Isabel Souto & Bruno Alves, 2022. "Healthcare Services and Formal Caregiver’s Psychosocial Risk Factors: An Observational Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-10, April.
    7. Işıl Karatuna & Mikaela Owen & Hugo Westerlund & Hanne Berthelsen, 2022. "The Role of Staff-Assessed Care Quality in the Relationship between Job Demands and Stress in Human Service Work: The Example of Dentistry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-13, October.
    8. Frida Pilgaard & Anette Agardh & Per-Olof Östergren & Gisela Priebe, 2022. "Association between Experiences of Different Types of Harassment or Derogatory Treatment and Sexual Harassment among Employees at a Large Swedish University," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:9:p:1427-:d:1748552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.