Author
Listed:
- Roongnapa Intaruk
(Department of Physical Therapy, School of Allied Health Sciences, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand
Movement Sciences and Exercise Research Center, Walailak University (MoveSE-WU), Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand)
- Praphatson Sengsoon
(Department of Physical Therapy, School of Allied Health Sciences, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand
Movement Sciences and Exercise Research Center, Walailak University (MoveSE-WU), Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand)
Abstract
Background: Prolonged use of electronic devices in virtual classrooms can influence posture, neck angle, and body discomfort. Recent evidence suggests that not only “incorrect” postures but also sustained static positions, regardless of being ergonomically correct, contribute to musculoskeletal strain. However, limited studies have directly compared posture and discomfort across different types of devices in a virtual classroom setting. Objective: To evaluate differences in posture, neck angle, and body discomfort among female university students during the use of three electronic devices (smartphone, tablet, notebook) in a virtual classroom for 20 min. Methods: Twenty-four healthy female participants (aged 18–23 years) completed three randomized sessions using a smartphone, tablet, or notebook in a virtual classroom task. Posture was assessed using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA), neck angle was measured via motion analysis, and body discomfort was rated with a standardized visual analog scale. Statistical analyses were performed using repeated-measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction, with effect sizes reported. Results: Significant differences were observed in posture (RULA scores: smartphone 5.12 ± 1.26; tablet 4.62 ± 1.35; notebook 4.21 ± 1.32, p < 0.05), neck angle (smartphone 32.48 ± 11.81 and tablet 36.93 ± 7.97, p > 0.05; notebook 39.30 ± 7.82, p > 0.05), and body discomfort of all regions (VAS: smartphone 1.08 ± 1.69; tablet 1.06 ± 1.75; notebook 1.01 ± 1.66, p < 0.05). Although all devices induced discomfort after 20 min of sustained posture, the smartphone condition showed the greatest neck flexion and discomfort. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that sustained posture during virtual classroom activities leads to increased neck angle deviation and body discomfort, with device type influencing the magnitude of these effects. These findings highlight the importance of postural variability and active breaks, rather than relying solely on maintaining a “correct” posture, to reduce musculoskeletal strain in technology-based learning environments.
Suggested Citation
Roongnapa Intaruk & Praphatson Sengsoon, 2025.
"Differences in Posture, Neck Angle, and Body Discomfort During Various Electronic Device Usage with Virtual Classroom,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(9), pages 1-13, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:9:p:1418-:d:1747248
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:9:p:1418-:d:1747248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.