IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i9p1400-d1744126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptualising a Community-Based Response to Loneliness: The Representational Anchoring of Nature-Based Social Prescription by Professionals in Marseille, Insights from the RECETAS Project

Author

Listed:
  • Lucie Cattaneo

    (Service d’Evaluation Médicale, Hôpital sainte Marguerite, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13009 Marseille, France)

  • Alexandre Daguzan

    (Service d’Evaluation Médicale, Hôpital sainte Marguerite, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13009 Marseille, France)

  • Gabriela García Vélez

    (City Preservation Management Research Group, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, University of Cuenca, Cuenca 010150, Ecuador)

  • Stéphanie Gentile

    (Service d’Evaluation Médicale, Hôpital sainte Marguerite, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13009 Marseille, France
    School of Medicine, Aix Marseille Université, SSA, RITME, 13005 Marseille, France)

Abstract

Background: Urban loneliness is rising worldwide and is a recognised public-health threat. Nature-Based Social Prescriptions (NBSPs), guided group activities in natural settings, are being piloted in six cities through the EU project RECETAS. However, in new contexts such as Marseille, its implementation is constrained by professionals’ limited knowledge of the concept. Objectives: (i) Exploring how professionals in Marseille (France) conceptualise NBSPs; (ii) Identifying perceived facilitators and barriers to implementing NBSPs among residents facing social isolation and loneliness. Methods: Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with health, social-care, and urban–environment professionals selected via network mapping and snowball sampling. Verbatim transcripts underwent inductive thematic analysis informed by Social Representation Theory, with double coding to enhance reliability. Results: Five analytic themes emerged: (1) a holistic health paradigm linking nature, community, and well-being; (2) stark ecological inequities with limited green-space access in deprived districts; (3) work challenges due to the urgent needs of individuals facing significant socio-economic challenges in demanding contexts; (4) a key tension between a perceived top-down process and a preference for participatory approaches; (5) drivers and obstacles: strong professional endorsement of NBSPs meets significant systemic and institutional constraints. Conclusions: Professionals endorse NBSPs as a promising approach against loneliness, provided programmes tackle structural inequities and adopt participatory governance. Results inform the Marseille RECETAS pilot and contribute to global discussions on environmentally anchored health promotion.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucie Cattaneo & Alexandre Daguzan & Gabriela García Vélez & Stéphanie Gentile, 2025. "Conceptualising a Community-Based Response to Loneliness: The Representational Anchoring of Nature-Based Social Prescription by Professionals in Marseille, Insights from the RECETAS Project," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(9), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:9:p:1400-:d:1744126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/9/1400/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/9/1400/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:9:p:1400-:d:1744126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.