IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i9p1387-d1742957.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictors of Major Amputation and Mortality in Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Retrospective Nationwide Inpatient Sample Study

Author

Listed:
  • Lior Ben Zvi

    (Department of Orthopedics, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa 3436212, Israel
    Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 2611001, Israel
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • David Maman

    (Department of Orthopedics, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa 3436212, Israel
    Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 2611001, Israel
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Michael Margulis

    (Department of Orthopedics, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa 3436212, Israel
    Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 2611001, Israel)

  • Yaron Berkovich

    (Department of Orthopedics, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa 3436212, Israel
    Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 2611001, Israel)

Abstract

Background: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) affect approximately 15% of diabetic patients and are the leading cause of non-traumatic lower extremity amputations worldwide. This study examines trends in DFU management, predictors of major amputation and in-hospital mortality, and the impact of comorbidities on outcomes. Methods: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (2016–2019), we analyzed non-elective admissions of DFU patients categorized into four treatment groups: no surgery, debridement, minor amputation, and major amputation (below-knee or above-knee). Statistical analyses identified factors associated with major amputation and mortality. Results: A significant increase in minor amputations and debridement was observed between 2016 and 2019, while the number of major amputations declined ( p < 0.001). Comorbidities varied significantly by treatment type, with dyslipidemia (49.4–51.0%), chronic kidney disease (30.1–44.2%), and hypertension (32.9–47.0%) being the most prevalent ( p < 0.001). Major amputation was associated with the highest rate of in-hospital mortality (1.00%) and the longest hospital stay (11.2 days) ( p < 0.001). Logistic regression identified sepsis (OR = 4.9, 95% CI: 4.3–5.6), stroke (OR = 3, 95% CI: 2.1–5.5), and pulmonary embolism (OR = 3.7, 95% CI: 2–6) as key predictors of major amputation, while myocardial infarction (OR = 956, 95% CI: 319–2857) and sepsis (OR = 25, 95% CI: 20–29) were the strongest predictors of mortality ( p < 0.001). Conclusions: These findings underscore the impact of comorbidities on DFU outcomes and emphasize the need for early intervention to reduce severe complications. Future research should focus on optimizing management strategies for high-risk patients to improve clinical and surgical outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Lior Ben Zvi & David Maman & Michael Margulis & Yaron Berkovich, 2025. "Predictors of Major Amputation and Mortality in Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Retrospective Nationwide Inpatient Sample Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(9), pages 1-11, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:9:p:1387-:d:1742957
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/9/1387/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/9/1387/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:9:p:1387-:d:1742957. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.