Author
Listed:
- Paula Schmidt Azevedo
(Internal Medicine Department, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18618-687, Brazil)
- Juli Thomaz de Souza
(Internal Medicine Department, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18618-687, Brazil)
- Alessandro Ferrari Jacinto
(Department of Medicine, Centro Universitário de Adamantina (FAI), Adamantina 17800-000, Brazil)
- Déborah Oliveira
(Faculty of Nursing, Campus Viña del Mar, Universidad Andrés Bello, Viña del Mar 2531015, Chile
Millenium Institute for Care Research (MICARE), Santiago 8370134, Chile)
- Fania Cristina dos Santos
(Department of Medicine, Paulista School of Medicine, Federal University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo 04025-002, Brazil)
- Marcos Ferreira Minicucci
(Internal Medicine Department, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18618-687, Brazil)
- Paulo José Fortes Villas Boas
(Internal Medicine Department, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18618-687, Brazil)
- Wilco Achterberg
(Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands)
- Patrick Alexander Wachholz
(Internal Medicine Department, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18618-687, Brazil)
Abstract
Background: Pain detection and management in older people with impaired cognition is an unmet need, leading to healthcare inequalities. This study aimed to enhance pain detection by translating and culturally adapting the PAIC-15 questionnaire into Brazilian Portuguese, establishing its content validity and comparing findings with a similar Dutch study. Methods: Following the same international standards used in the English-to-Dutch validation, we translated and culturally adapted PAIC-15 for Brazil. Content validity was assessed using two questions: (A) whether the item indicated pain and (B) whether it was specific to pain. An online form was distributed to ‘target users’ (nurses and geriatricians in LTCFs or other settings) and other healthcare professionals (HCPs) experienced in pain assessment in people with cognitive decline. Results were compared with the English-to-Dutch validation. Results: A total of 103 HCPs responded (mean age 45.2 ± 11.4 years)—76 (74%) were female and 54 (52%) had previously used pain assessment tools. Among the 63 target users, 13 items (87%) were validated as indicative and/or specific to pain. Comparing Brazilian and Dutch users, 10 items (67%) showed agreement on pain specificity. Conclusions: The Brazilian Portuguese PAIC-15 is now available, showing acceptable content validity. Linguistic challenges highlight the need for training and further validation in larger samples.
Suggested Citation
Paula Schmidt Azevedo & Juli Thomaz de Souza & Alessandro Ferrari Jacinto & Déborah Oliveira & Fania Cristina dos Santos & Marcos Ferreira Minicucci & Paulo José Fortes Villas Boas & Wilco Achterberg , 2025.
"Reducing Barriers for Best Practice in People Living with Dementia: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Content Validity of the Brazilian Version of the Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition (PAIC-15) Meta-,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(9), pages 1-15, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:9:p:1324-:d:1732918
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:9:p:1324-:d:1732918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.