IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i8p1277-d1724950.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Content Analysis of Assessment Tools Used in Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review with Linkage to the International Classification of Functioning

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Heloiza Araujo Silva

    (Center for Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59078-900, Brazil)

  • Thaissa Hamana de Macedo Dantas

    (Center for Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59078-900, Brazil)

  • Ana Cecília de Medeiros Araújo

    (Faculty of Health Sciences of Trairi, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Santa Cruz 59200-000, Brazil)

  • Diego de Sousa Dantas

    (Center for Health Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50670-420, Brazil)

  • Maria Isabelle de Araújo Dantas

    (Faculty of Health Sciences of Trairi, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Santa Cruz 59200-000, Brazil)

  • Beatriz Cristina Medeiros de Lucena

    (Faculty of Health Sciences of Trairi, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Santa Cruz 59200-000, Brazil)

  • Isabelly Cristina Rodrigues Regalado Moura

    (Faculty of Health Sciences of Trairi, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Santa Cruz 59200-000, Brazil)

  • Aline Braga Galvão Silveira Fernandes

    (Faculty of Health Sciences of Trairi, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Santa Cruz 59200-000, Brazil)

Abstract

Stroke rehabilitation requires comprehensive assessments aligned with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) biopsychosocial model. Linking assessment tools to the ICF helps integrate this approach by identifying aspects of functioning they address. This study aimed to analyze the content of the most used assessment tools for post-stroke rehabilitation through systematic linkage with the ICF. A scoping review was conducted, including (1) the identification of clinical trials on post-stroke rehabilitation published between 2014 and 2024 in the PubMed, LILACS, SciELO, and PEDro databases to select the most commonly used assessment tools, followed by (2) the ICF linkage methodology to map the most cited tools to the content of ICF categories and domains. From the 897 studies reviewed, 29 tools were identified—21 were newly linked and 8 had pre-existing ICF links. The analysis identified 261 ICF categories: 53% related to Activities, 31% to Body Functions, 15% to Participation, and 1% to Environmental Factors. No tool covered the Body Structure domain. The findings highlight a focus on Activities and Body Functions, reinforcing the need to integrate Participation and Environmental Factors into post-stroke rehabilitation assessments. The results offer an overview of ICF categories covered by each tool, supporting informed decisions in rehabilitation research and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Heloiza Araujo Silva & Thaissa Hamana de Macedo Dantas & Ana Cecília de Medeiros Araújo & Diego de Sousa Dantas & Maria Isabelle de Araújo Dantas & Beatriz Cristina Medeiros de Lucena & Isabelly, 2025. "Content Analysis of Assessment Tools Used in Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review with Linkage to the International Classification of Functioning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(8), pages 1-14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:8:p:1277-:d:1724950
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/8/1277/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/8/1277/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:8:p:1277-:d:1724950. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.