Author
Listed:
- Matthew Oosthuizen
(School of Medical and Health Sciences, Joondalup Campus, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia)
- Kerry Staples
(Department of Health (Western Australia), Epidemiology Directorate, Perth, WA 6004, Australia)
- Adelle Liebenberg
(School of Medical and Health Sciences, Joondalup Campus, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia)
- Kiam Padamsey
(School of Medical and Health Sciences, Joondalup Campus, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia)
- Marcus Cattani
(School of Medical and Health Sciences, Joondalup Campus, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia)
- Andy McCarthy
(School of Medical and Health Sciences, Joondalup Campus, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia)
- Jacques Oosthuizen
(School of Medical and Health Sciences, Joondalup Campus, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia)
Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyse the Western Australian (WA) Safety Regulatory System (SRS) database to assess compliance of the WA mining sector regarding workers exposure to welding fumes and to identify trends over time. De-identified data analysed to assess the impact of reducing workplace exposure standards (WES) for general welding fumes on industry compliance. Historical trend analysis shows a shift from 100% compliance to 100% non-compliance, based on mean values and 95% confidence intervals, with exposure levels remaining consistent over time. These findings highlight the need for current, innovative engineering solutions, and raise questions about the validity of current sampling methods. Powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs) integrated with welding helmets can reduce exposures by up to 99.96%, making their adoption as industry best practice critical, yet current sampling methodologies measure welding fume levels outside PAPRs, thus potentially misclassifying workers who are adequately protected as non-compliant. The sampling method is also influenced by other particulate matter present in the workplace that may be due to grinding or other dust generating activities in the vicinity of the welder. Lower WES values necessitate a review of exposure assessment and reporting methods to accurately reflect worker exposures.
Suggested Citation
Matthew Oosthuizen & Kerry Staples & Adelle Liebenberg & Kiam Padamsey & Marcus Cattani & Andy McCarthy & Jacques Oosthuizen, 2025.
"Welding Fume in the Western Australian Mining Industry: Impact of a Change to the Workplace Exposure Standard,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(8), pages 1-10, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:8:p:1238-:d:1720202
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:8:p:1238-:d:1720202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.