Author
Listed:
- Sarakawa Abalo Niman
(Laboratory of Waste Management, Treatment and Recovery (GTVD), Faculty of Sciences, University of Lomé, Lomé BP 1515, Togo
Regional Excellence Centre on Sustainable Cities in Africa (CERViDA-DOUNEDON), University of Lomé, Lomé BP 1515, Togo)
- Edem Komi Koledzi
(Laboratory of Waste Management, Treatment and Recovery (GTVD), Faculty of Sciences, University of Lomé, Lomé BP 1515, Togo
Regional Excellence Centre on Sustainable Cities in Africa (CERViDA-DOUNEDON), University of Lomé, Lomé BP 1515, Togo)
- Nitale M’balikine Krou
(Laboratory of Organic Chemistry and Environmental Sciences (LaCOSE), Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Kara, Kara BP 404, Togo)
Abstract
Increasing the use of healthcare facilities has resulted in the growing production of biomedical waste, which poses health risks to users, health professionals, and the environment. The aim of this research is to study the correlation between governance in Togo’s public health facilities and the quality of biomedical waste management within these facilities. Methods: This was a cross-sectional, descriptive, and analytical study conducted from September to December 2024. It involved 264 public health facilities of all types in all health regions of Togo. Health facilities were selected using the simple random selection technique. Healthcare providers were selected using the reasoned choice technique. The statistical tests used were the chi-square test and logistic regression, which enabled proportions to be compared and confounding factors to be eliminated, respectively. Results: Multivariate analysis revealed a statistically significant association between the organization and training component of governance and the quality of biomedical waste management (BMWM) in health facilities (OR = 3.79; 95% CI [1.79–8.03]; p < 0.001). This relationship suggests that health facilities with functional infection prevention and control (ICP) or BMWM committees, trained staff at all levels (nursing, technical, and administrative), and dedicated waste management personnel are more likely to implement compliant waste management practices. Analyses of the data also revealed that, among the criteria for assessing the quality of biomedical waste management (BMWM), the most significant were sorting (OR = 1.482; 95% CI [1.286; 1.708]), quantification (OR = 2.026; 95% CI [1.491; 2.753]), transportation (OR = 1.403; 95% CI [1.187; 1.66]), and disposal infrastructure (OR = 1.604; 95% CI [1.298; 1.982]). The application of this grid shows that 17.8% of the health facilities surveyed had a score equal to or above 80% on all the criteria used to assess the quality of biomedical waste management, and they were therefore managing waste in an “acceptable” manner. The study highlights key findings in biomedical waste management practices, providing actionable insights for improving public health safety.
Suggested Citation
Sarakawa Abalo Niman & Edem Komi Koledzi & Nitale M’balikine Krou, 2025.
"Analysis of the Correlation Between the Governance and Quality of Biomedical Waste Management in Public Health Facilities in Togo, 2024,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(7), pages 1-24, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:7:p:1089-:d:1697025
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:7:p:1089-:d:1697025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.