IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i7p1080-d1695805.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Stress Scale (DSC): Development and Psychometric Validation of a Measure of Stress in the Digital Age

Author

Listed:
  • Agathi Argyriadi

    (Department of Psychology, Frederick University, Nicosia 1036, Cyprus)

  • Dimitra Katsarou

    (Department of Preschool Education Sciences and Educational Design, University of the Aegean, 85100 Rhodes, Greece)

  • Athina Patelarou

    (Department of Nursing, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71410 Heraklion, Greece)

  • Kalliopi Megari

    (Department of Psychology, City College, University of York, Europe Campus, 54622 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Evridiki Patelarou

    (Department of Nursing, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71410 Heraklion, Greece)

  • Stiliani Kotrotsiou

    (Department of Nursing, University of Patras, 26504 Patra, Greece)

  • Konstantinos Giakoumidakis

    (Department of Nursing, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71410 Heraklion, Greece)

  • Shabnam Abdoola

    (Department of Speech and Language Pathology, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain 15551, United Arab Emirates)

  • Evangelos Mantsos

    (Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, University of Thessaly, 42100 Trikala, Greece)

  • Efthymia Efthymiou

    (Department of Interdisciplinary Studies, Zayed University, Abu Dhabi 144534, United Arab Emirates)

  • Alexandros Argyriadis

    (Department of Nursing, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71410 Heraklion, Greece)

Abstract

(1) Background: The integration of digital technologies such as electronic health records (EHRs), telepsychiatry, and communication platforms has transformed the mental health sector a lot compared to in previous years. While these tools enhance service delivery, they also introduce unique stressors. Despite growing concerns, there is no validated instrument specifically designed to measure the digital stress experienced by mental health professionals. (2) Methods: This study involved the development and psychometric validation of the Digital Stress Scale (DSC). The process included item generation through a literature review and qualitative interviews, expert panel validation, and a two-phase statistical evaluation. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were conducted on responses from 423 licensed mental health professionals using EHRs and digital communication tools. The scale’s reliability and convergent validity were assessed via internal consistency and correlations with established mental health measures. (3) Results: The final DSC included four subscales: digital fatigue, technostress, digital disengagement, and work–life digital boundaries. CFA supported the factor structure (CFI = 0.965, RMSEA = 0.038), and the overall reliability was acceptable (Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.87). Descriptive analysis showed moderate-to-high levels of digital stress (M = 11.94, SD = 2.72). Digital fatigue was the strongest predictor of total stress (β = 1.00, p < 0.001), followed by technostress and work–life boundary violations. All subscales were significantly correlated with burnout (r = 0.72), job dissatisfaction (r = −0.61), and perceived stress (r = 0.68), all with a p < 0.001. (4) Conclusions: The DSC is a valid and reliable tool for assessing digital stress among mental health professionals. Findings point out the urgent need for policy-level interventions to mitigate digital overload, promote healthy work–life boundaries, and enhance digital competency in mental health settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Agathi Argyriadi & Dimitra Katsarou & Athina Patelarou & Kalliopi Megari & Evridiki Patelarou & Stiliani Kotrotsiou & Konstantinos Giakoumidakis & Shabnam Abdoola & Evangelos Mantsos & Efthymia Efthym, 2025. "Digital Stress Scale (DSC): Development and Psychometric Validation of a Measure of Stress in the Digital Age," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(7), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:7:p:1080-:d:1695805
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/7/1080/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/7/1080/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:7:p:1080-:d:1695805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.