IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i7p1032-d1689782.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neonatal Jaundice Treatment Versus Recommendations: The Challenge of Treatment Without Rapid Diagnostic Capability

Author

Listed:
  • Ashura Bakari

    (Department of Child Health, Suntreso Government Hospital, Ghana Health Service, Kumasi AK-039, Ghana
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Ann V. Wolski

    (Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, and Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Benjamin Otoo

    (Department of Child Health, Suntreso Government Hospital, Ghana Health Service, Kumasi AK-039, Ghana)

  • Rexford Amoah

    (Department of Child Health, Suntreso Government Hospital, Ghana Health Service, Kumasi AK-039, Ghana)

  • Elizabeth Kaselitz

    (Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, and Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA)

  • Sarah D. Compton

    (Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, and Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA)

  • Rebekah Shaw

    (Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, and Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA)

  • Cheryl A. Moyer

    (Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, and Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA)

Abstract

Neonatal jaundice (NNJ) is a leading cause of death in the early neonatal period, disproportionately affecting newborns in sub-Saharan Africa. In a setting without access to rapid assessment via transcutaneous bilirubin meter, we sought to determine how closely the diagnosis and treatment of neonatal jaundice at an urban district hospital aligned with retrospective assessment and treatment recommendations using the BiliApp (based on the UK NICE Guideline CG98). This retrospective chart review study aimed to identify: (1) What percent of admissions within 8 days of birth to the Mother and Baby Unit (MBU) at our study site were admitted for a primary diagnosis of neonatal jaundice, and what characterized those admissions? (2) How did treatment provided compare to the recommendations of the United Kingdom NICE Guideline CG98 via the “BiliApp”? and (3) Among those with jaundice, what factors were associated with an increased likelihood of severity indicative of the need for blood exchange therapy? The charts of all neonates admitted to the MBU at Suntreso Government Hospital (SGH), in Kumasi, Ghana, in 2020 were reviewed by trained research assistants. Data were collected regarding demographics, reason for admission, diagnostic markers (e.g., serum bilirubin level), treatments performed in the hospital, and outcome. Data were analyzed using Stata 18.0. There were 1059 newborns admitted to the MBU in 2020 at less than 8 days of age. A total of 179 (16.9%) were admitted with a primary diagnosis of neonatal jaundice. According to the BiliApp, 29.4% ( n = 50) of newborns admitted for jaundice had bilirubin levels that were normal or below the phototherapy threshold for their gestational age on admission; 25.3% ( n = 43) were at or near the threshold for phototherapy; 21.2% ( n = 36) were above the phototherapy threshold; and 24.1% ( n = 41) were above the blood exchange therapy threshold. The BiliApp recommended no treatment for 21.2% ( n = 36) of newborns, repeated assessment for 33.6% ( n = 57), phototherapy for 21.2% ( n = 36), and exchange therapy for 24.1% ( n = 41). By comparison, 8.2% ( n = 14) of neonates admitted for jaundice received no treatment, 77.8% ( n = 133) received phototherapy only, and 14.0% ( n = 24) received both phototherapy and exchange therapy. Without sufficient data on G6PD status and parent/newborn blood type to include in the analysis, the biggest risk factors for a BiliApp recommendation of exchange therapy included serum bilirubin level (OR 1.01, p < 0.001) and gestational age (OR 0.51, p < 0.001), even after controlling for breastfeeding and male sex of the newborn. Without access to rapid assessment tools, many providers in low-resource settings are put in a position to presumptively treat newborns suspected of having jaundice, rather than waiting for serum lab tests to return. Given the cost of transcutaneous bilirubin meters, additional options for rapid diagnostic testing are warranted.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashura Bakari & Ann V. Wolski & Benjamin Otoo & Rexford Amoah & Elizabeth Kaselitz & Sarah D. Compton & Rebekah Shaw & Cheryl A. Moyer, 2025. "Neonatal Jaundice Treatment Versus Recommendations: The Challenge of Treatment Without Rapid Diagnostic Capability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(7), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:7:p:1032-:d:1689782
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/7/1032/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/7/1032/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:7:p:1032-:d:1689782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.