IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i7p1010-d1688210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exposure to Toxic Compounds Using Alternative Smoking Products: Analysis of Empirical Data

Author

Listed:
  • Sandra Sakalauskaite

    (Laboratory of Immunology, Department of Immunology and Allergology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 50161 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Linas Zdanavicius

    (Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Jekaterina Šteinmiller

    (Nursing Department, Tallinn Health Care College, 13418 Tallinn, Estonia)

  • Natalja Istomina

    (Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania
    Faculty of Public Governance and Business, Mykolas Romeris University, 08303 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

Tobacco control policies have aimed to reduce the global prevalence of smoking. Unfortunately, the recent survey data shows that about 24% of Europeans still smoke. Although combustible cigarettes remain the most used tobacco product, the tendency made evident in the prevalence of smoking-alternative nicotine-containing products increases. Studies that can objectively assess the long-term health effects of the latter products are lacking, so assessing toxic substances associated with smoking-alternative products and comparing them to substances from combustible cigarettes could inform future public health efforts. The manufacturers of these alternative products claim that the use of alternatives to combustible cigarettes reduces exposure to toxic compounds, but the reality is unclear. This study compares the concentrations of toxic substances in generated aerosols and performs calculations based on mainstream cigarette smoke and aerosols from smoking-alternative products. It summarizes the amounts of harmful and potentially harmful constituents per single puff. Alternative smoking products are undoubtedly harmful to non-smokers. Still, based on the analysis of the latest independent studies’ empirical data, the concentrations of inhaled HPHCs using heated tobacco products or e-cigarettes are reduced up to 91–98%, respectively; therefore, for those who cannot quit, these could provide a less harmful alternative. However, more well-designed studies of alternative product emissions are needed, including an analysis of the compounds that are not present in conventional tobacco products (e.g., thermal degradation products of propylene glycol, glycerol, or flavorings) to evaluate possible future health effects objectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra Sakalauskaite & Linas Zdanavicius & Jekaterina Šteinmiller & Natalja Istomina, 2025. "Exposure to Toxic Compounds Using Alternative Smoking Products: Analysis of Empirical Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(7), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:7:p:1010-:d:1688210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/7/1010/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/7/1010/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yeongkwon Son & Chiranjivi Bhattarai & Vera Samburova & Andrey Khlystov, 2020. "Carbonyls and Carbon Monoxide Emissions from Electronic Cigarettes Affected by Device Type and Use Patterns," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Violaine Saint-André & Bruno Charbit & Anne Biton & Vincent Rouilly & Céline Possémé & Anthony Bertrand & Maxime Rotival & Jacob Bergstedt & Etienne Patin & Matthew L. Albert & Lluis Quintana-Murci & , 2024. "Smoking changes adaptive immunity with persistent effects," Nature, Nature, vol. 626(8000), pages 827-835, February.
    3. Nargiz Travis & Marie Knoll & Steven Cook & Hayoung Oh & Christopher J. Cadham & Luz María Sánchez-Romero & David T. Levy, 2023. "Chemical Profiles and Toxicity of Electronic Cigarettes: An Umbrella Review and Methodological Considerations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-15, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alejandro Svarch-Pérez & María Vanessa Paz-González & Carlota Ruiz-Juárez & Juan C. Olvera-Chacón & Angelina Larios-Solís & Santiago Castro-Gaytán & Eugenia Aldeco-Pérez & Jorge Carlos Alcocer-Varela, 2024. "Methods for a Non-Targeted Qualitative Analysis and Quantification of Benzene, Toluene, and Xylenes by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry of E-Liquids and Aerosols in Commercially Available Electron," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(10), pages 1-11, September.
    2. Alexandra Noël & Arpita Ghosh, 2022. "Carbonyl Profiles of Electronic Nicotine Delivery System (ENDS) Aerosols Reflect Both the Chemical Composition and the Numbers of E-Liquid Ingredients–Focus on the In Vitro Toxicity of Strawberry and ," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Yeongkwon Son & Clifford Weisel & Olivia Wackowski & Stephan Schwander & Cristine Delnevo & Qingyu Meng, 2020. "The Impact of Device Settings, Use Patterns, and Flavorings on Carbonyl Emissions from Electronic Cigarettes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Edward C. Hensel & Nathan C. Eddingsaas & Qutaiba M. Saleh & Shehan Jayasekera & Samantha Emma Sarles & A. Gary DiFrancesco & Risa J. Robinson, 2022. "Proposed Standard Test Protocols and Outcome Measures for Quantitative Comparison of Emissions from Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-19, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:7:p:1010-:d:1688210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.