Author
Listed:
- Jaroslava Huber
(Pro2Future GmbH, 4040 Linz, Austria
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Bernhard Anzengruber-Tanase
(Pro2Future GmbH, 4040 Linz, Austria
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Martin Schobesberger
(Institute of Pervasive Computing, Johannes Kepler University, 4040 Linz, Austria
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Michael Haslgrübler
(Pro2Future GmbH, 4040 Linz, Austria
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Robert Fischer-Schwarz
(Department of Machine Safety, AUVA, 1100 Vienna, Austria
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Alois Ferscha
(Institute of Pervasive Computing, Johannes Kepler University, 4040 Linz, Austria)
Abstract
AI technologies are becoming increasingly prevalent in industrial workplaces, extending their applications beyond productivity to critical areas such as occupational safety. From our perspective, it is important to consider the safety of these AI systems for users already at the research and development stage, rather than only after deployment. Therefore, in this review, we synthesize publications that propose such AI-based safety systems to assess how potential risks are addressed early in their design and prototype stages. Consequently, we explore current advancements in AI-driven, sensor-based, and human-centered applications designed to enhance occupational safety by monitoring compliance, detecting hazards in real time, or assisting users. These systems leverage wearables and environmental sensing to proactively identify risks, support decision-making, and contribute to creating safer work environments. In this paper, we categorize the technologies according to the sensors used and highlight which features are preventive, reactive, or post-incident. Furthermore, we address potential risks posed by these AI applications, as they may introduce new hazards for workers. Through a critical review of current research and existing regulations, we identify gaps and propose key considerations for the safe and ethical deployment of trustworthy AI systems. Our findings suggest that in AI- and sensor-based research applications for occupational safety, some features and risks are considered notably less than others, from which we deduce that, while AI is being increasingly utilized to improve occupational safety, there is a significant need to address regulatory and ethical challenges for its widespread and safe adoption in industrial domains.
Suggested Citation
Jaroslava Huber & Bernhard Anzengruber-Tanase & Martin Schobesberger & Michael Haslgrübler & Robert Fischer-Schwarz & Alois Ferscha, 2025.
"Evaluating User Safety Aspects of AI-Based Systems in Industrial Occupational Safety: A Critical Review of Research Literature,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(5), pages 1-25, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:5:p:705-:d:1646011
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:5:p:705-:d:1646011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.