Author
Listed:
- Kristy Gourley
(Neuromechanics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA)
- Harish Chander
(School of Health Related Professions, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA)
- Asher Street Beam
(School of Health Related Professions, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA)
- Adam C. Knight
(Neuromechanics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA)
Abstract
Background: Sounds that cause disturbances and perturbations to the vestibular (inner ear organ responses) and visual (acute oculomotor responses) systems can impact postural stability. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of different types of sounds and noises on both static and dynamic PS. Methods: A total of 20 participants (12 females and 8 males; age: 21.35 ± 1.79 years; height: 170.7 ± 9.3 cm; mass: 66.725 ± 14.1 kg) were tested using the limits of stability (LOS) test on the BTrackS™ balance plate and a Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, when exposed to four different sounds and occupational noises [construction noise (CN), white noise (WN), sirens (SRs), and nature sounds (NAs)] in a randomized order with a no sounds (NSs) control performed initially (intensity range of 70–80 dB). The center of pressure (COP) total sway area (cm 2 ) from the LOS and the time to completion of the TUG (seconds) were analyzed using a one-way repeated measures of analysis of variance at an alpha level of 0.05. Results: The observations demonstrated significant differences between the sounds and noises for the TUG ( p < 0.001) but not for the LOS test ( p = 0.406). Pairwise comparisons for the significant main effect for the TUG revealed that NSs demonstrated significantly slower time to completion compared to CN, WN, and SRs but not NAs. Conclusions: The findings suggest that the different sounds and noises did not impact static PS during the LOS test, which involved the voluntary excursion of the COP while maintaining the same base of support (BOS). However, during dynamic PS with a changing BOS while walking in the TUG, exposure to CN, SRs, and WN demonstrated a faster completion time than NSs or NAs. This finding may be attributed to the anxiety induced by the noise immersion and perception of sounds, compared to calm NAs and no sounds. The findings can aid in better understanding the impact of different occupational noises on PS and emphasize the need for better noise protection and reduction in loud work environments.
Suggested Citation
Kristy Gourley & Harish Chander & Asher Street Beam & Adam C. Knight, 2025.
"Impact of Different Occupational Noises on Static and Dynamic Postural Stability in Healthy Young Adults,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(5), pages 1-9, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:5:p:679-:d:1642331
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:5:p:679-:d:1642331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.