IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i5p656-d1639685.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equitable Care for Older Australians: A Comparative Analysis of Aged Care Workforce Shortages in Metropolitan, Rural, and Remote Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas Morris

    (Care Economy Research Institute, La Trobe University, Wodonga, VIC 3689, Australia)

  • Susan Jaffer

    (Law School, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia)

  • Stacey Ann Rich

    (John Richards Centre for Rural Ageing Research, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Wodonga, VIC 3689, Australia)

  • Kate Syme-Lamont

    (Care Economy Research Institute, La Trobe University, Wodonga, VIC 3689, Australia)

  • Irene D. Blackberry

    (Care Economy Research Institute, La Trobe University, Wodonga, VIC 3689, Australia
    John Richards Centre for Rural Ageing Research, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Wodonga, VIC 3689, Australia)

Abstract

The Australian Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety has highlighted the chronic shortages of labour to provide care for those aged 65 and over in rural and remote areas of Australia. This descriptive cross-sectional study compares the availability of care provision in metropolitan regions with that in rural and remote regions. We analysed the 2021 Australian Census, grouped according to Aged-Care-Planning Region (ACPR), and investigated the numbers of people aged 65 years and over with different levels of care need, both in residential care and in-home. The available workforce in each ACPR was also examined in detail, using occupational classifications reported in the Census, and shortages of doctors, nurses, allied health and other care workers were identified. Overall, an additional 492,416 care hours were needed per week (or 12,958 full-time equivalent (FTE) care workers) in order to bring remote community ACPRs to parity with provision in metropolitan ACPRs. A further 95,342 FTE workers were needed in rural ACPRs to bring these areas to parity with metropolitan ACPRs. Our findings underscore the ongoing disparities in aged care workforce availability between metropolitan, rural, and remote regions of Australia. Addressing these workforce shortages is crucial to ensuring equitable access to care for older Australians, regardless of their geographical location. The implementation of targeted strategies to enhance workforce recruitment, retention, and training in these underserved areas is essential to bridge the gap and improve the quality of care provided to older adults in rural and remote communities. Such strategies could include targeted recruitment campaigns and incentives for professionals to relocate; further capacity for clinical placements and supervision in rural areas; tailoring funding and employment models for rural needs; and strengthening vocational education in regional areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas Morris & Susan Jaffer & Stacey Ann Rich & Kate Syme-Lamont & Irene D. Blackberry, 2025. "Equitable Care for Older Australians: A Comparative Analysis of Aged Care Workforce Shortages in Metropolitan, Rural, and Remote Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(5), pages 1-25, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:5:p:656-:d:1639685
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/5/656/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/5/656/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clare Wilding & Hilary Davis & Tshepo Rasekaba & Mohammad Hamiduzzaman & Kayla Royals & Jennene Greenhill & Megan E. O’Connell & David Perkins & Michael Bauer & Debra Morgan & Irene Blackberry, 2021. "Volunteers’ Support of Carers of Rural People Living with Dementia to Use a Custom-Built Application," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-9, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:5:p:656-:d:1639685. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.