IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i4p632-d1636750.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Potential Role of Ecotoxicological Data in National Essential Medicine Lists: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Camila Heredia

    (MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON M5B 1T8, Canada)

  • Aine Workentin

    (MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON M5B 1T8, Canada)

  • Gillian Parker

    (CHSC Student Training Program, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada)

  • Navindra Persaud

    (MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON M5B 1T8, Canada
    Department of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5B 1X2, Canada)

Abstract

Background: Medicines affect the environment throughout their lifecycle, from production and distribution to use and disposal. They contribute to the pollution of air, water, and soil, impacting ecosystems and human health. Recognizing these risks, regulatory bodies and organizations have highlighted pharmaceutical pollution as a global concern, emphasizing the need for environmental risk assessments and sustainable practices. Methods: This study reviewed the essential medicines lists (EMLs) from 158 countries and examined the available ecotoxicological data. Medicines with high bioaccumulation, persistence, and toxicity were identified and cross-referenced with their inclusion in EMLs. Additionally, we analyzed the presence of alternative medicines with similar therapeutic effects but potentially lower environmental risks. Results: Five medicines—ciprofloxacin, ethinylestradiol, levonorgestrel, ibuprofen, and sertraline—were selected as illustrative examples due to their high environmental persistence and toxicity. All were listed in the 2023 WHO model list, with ciprofloxacin appearing in 94.3% of national EMLs. Conclusions: This study underscores the limited availability of ecotoxicological data, which hinders environmental risk assessment for medicines. EMLs could serve as a tool to enhance the awareness and data mobilization of pharmaceutical pollution. Incorporating environmental criteria into EMLs could support more sustainable medicine selection and regulatory practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Camila Heredia & Aine Workentin & Gillian Parker & Navindra Persaud, 2025. "The Potential Role of Ecotoxicological Data in National Essential Medicine Lists: A Cross-Sectional Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(4), pages 1-14, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:4:p:632-:d:1636750
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/4/632/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/4/632/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marieke Sijm-Eeken & Monique Jaspers & Linda Peute, 2023. "Identifying Environmental Impact Factors for Sustainable Healthcare: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(18), pages 1-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Savoldelli & Daniele Landi & Caterina Rizzi, 2024. "Exploring Quantitative Methodologies for Assessing the Environmental, Social, and Economic Impacts of Telemedicine: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Reem F. Alruwaili & Nourah Alsadaan & Abeer Nuwayfi Alruwaili & Afrah Ghazi Alrumayh, 2023. "Unveiling the Symbiosis of Environmental Sustainability and Infection Control in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-16, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:4:p:632-:d:1636750. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.